Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070500›Full record

SynthesisJournal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi2020

The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea.

SuJin Kang, Jihyun Moon, Heewon Kang, Heekyoung Nam, Sangwoo Tak, Sung-Il Cho

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

SuJin KangInstitute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Jihyun MoonSamsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Heewon KangInstitute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Heekyoung NamDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Sangwoo TakInstitute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Sung-Il ChoInstitute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this paper, we aimed to investigate the evolving debate over border closure in Korea during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, to address the main themes associated with border closure, and to discuss the factors that need to be considered when making such decisions.

methodsWe collated and reviewed previously conducted review studies on border closures during infectious disease outbreaks to derive relevant themes and factors.

resultsAccording to our systematic review on border closures and travel restrictions, the effects of such containment efforts are limited. We suggest considering the following factors when determining whether to impose border closure measures: (1) disease characteristics, (2) timeliness of implementation, (3) transmission delay and the basic reproduction number, (4) globalization and pandemics, and (5) social and economic costs.

conclusionsOur assessment indicates that the effects of border closures are at best temporary and limited. Alternative measures must be contemplated and implemented to suppress the spread of COVID-19 in particular and infectious diseases more broadly.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Health PolicyHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRepublic of KoreaSARS-CoV-2TravelBorder closureControl measureCOVID-19 pandemicInfectious diseasesPolicy

Identifiers

PMID33070500
PMCPMC7569016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.