Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070476›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2020

What it takes to be at the top: The interrelationship between chronic social stress and social dominance.

Merima Šabanović, He Liu, Vongai Mlambo, Hala Aqel, Dipesh Chaudhury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New neurons flatten social hierarchies.Scientific reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Social dominance in rats is a determinant of susceptibility to stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Behavioral tests for the assessment of social hierarchy in mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merima ŠabanovićThe Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-6867-5739
He LiuThe Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Vongai MlamboThe Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Hala AqelThe Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Dipesh ChaudhuryThe Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-8014-6373
New York University Abu Dhabi · AE

Funding

Al Jalila Research Foundation AJF201638NYUAD Annual Research Budget, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation 22715NYUAD Research Enhancement FundNYU Research Enhancement Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDominance hierarchies of social animal groups are very sensitive to stress. Stress experienced prior to social interactions between conspecifics may be a determinant of their future social dynamics. Additionally, long-term occupancy of a specific hierarchical rank can have psychophysiological effects which increase vulnerability to future stressors.

methodsWe aimed to delineate differential effects of stress acting before or after hierarchy formation. We studied whether exposure to the chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) paradigm before a two-week-long hierarchy formation affected the attainment of a dominant status using the social confrontation tube test (TT). These animals were singly housed for at least one week before CSDS to decrease confounding effects of prior hierarchy experience. Additionally, we investigated whether social rank predicted vulnerability to CSDS, measured by a social interaction test.

resultsIn TT, mice termed as dominant (high rank) win the majority of social confrontations, while the subordinates (low rank) lose more often. Within newly established hierarchies of stress-naïve mice, the subordinate, but not dominant, mice exhibited significantly greater avoidance of novel social targets. However, following exposure to CSDS, both lowest- and highest-ranked mice exhibited susceptibility to stress as measured by decreased interactions with a novel social target. In contrast, after CSDS, both stress-susceptible (socially avoidant) and stress-resilient (social) mice were able to attain dominant ranks in newly established hierarchies.

conclusionThese results suggest that the response to CSDS did not determine social rank in new cohorts, but low-status mice in newly established groups exhibited lower sociability to novel social targets. Interestingly, exposure of a hierarchical social group to chronic social stress led to stress susceptibility in both high- and low-status mice as measured by social interaction.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial DominanceAnimalsMiceStress, Psychologicalanxietychronic social stresssociabilitysocial dominancesocial hierarchy

Identifiers

PMID33070476
PMCPMC7749537
OpenAlexW3093244323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.