Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2021
Comparison of medial rectus resection and plication in exotropic patients.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for intermittent exotropia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Plication or resection combined with antagonist recession in horizontal strabismus.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Article
- Analysis of temporal changes in thickness from conjunctiva to sclera after plication of the medial rectus muscle measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the surgical outcomes of the plication technique with the resection method to treat exotropic patients.
methodsIn this prospective randomized clinical trial, a total of 52 exotropic patients (27 females and 25 males) who were candidates for medial rectus resection were randomly classified into the plication (n = 24) and resection (n = 28) groups. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination included cyclorefraction, assessment of the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), evaluation of the extraocular muscle, ocular deviation measurement and stereopsis measured using a Titmus test. Ocular anterior and posterior segments were examined using slit-lamp and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Patients were randomly divided to medial rectus plication and medial rectus resection groups. The plication technique was the same as for resection, but in the last step the muscle was folded. Examinations were repeated at the 1- and 3-day as well as 1-, 2-, 3- and 6-month follow-ups. If the postoperative ocular deviation was in the range of 5 PD esotropia to 10 PD exotropia, it was considered a successful surgical outcome.
resultsResults show that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding near and far deviations (P
conclusionsMedial rectus plication is an effective and appropriate alternative option for medial rectus resection in exotropic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.