Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070208›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Changes in supramaximal M-wave amplitude at different regions of biceps brachii following eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors.

Hélio V Cabral, Kristen M Meiburger, Liliam F de Oliveira, Taian M Vieira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hélio V CabralBiomechanics Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Program (COPPE), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. heliocabral@peb.ufrj.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3252-0724
Kristen M MeiburgerBiolab, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-6135
Liliam F de OliveiraBiomechanics Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Program (COPPE), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-8639
Taian M VieiraPolitoBIOMed Lab, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6239-7301
Politecnico di Torino · ITUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico -Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88881.189605/2018-01Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos -Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 201.769/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious evidence from surface electromyograms (EMGs) suggests that exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) may manifest unevenly within the muscle. Here we investigated whether these regional changes were indeed associated with EIMD or if they were attributed to spurious factors often affecting EMGs.

methodsTen healthy male subjects performed 3 × 10 eccentric elbow flexions. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), muscle soreness and ultrasound images from biceps brachii distal and proximal regions were measured immediately before (baseline) and during each of the following 4 days after the exercise. Moreover, 64 monopolar surface EMGs were detected while 10 supramaximal pulses were applied to the musculocutaneous nerve. The innervation zone (IZ), the number of electrodes detecting largest M-waves and their centroid longitudinal coordinates were assessed to characterize the spatial distribution of the M-waves amplitude.

resultsThe MVC torque decreased (~ 25%; P < 0.001) while the perceived muscle soreness scale increased (~ 4 cm; 0 cm for no soreness and 10 cm for highest imaginable soreness; P < 0.005) across days. The echo intensity of the ultrasound images increased at 48 h (71%), 72 h (95%) and 96 h (112%) for both muscle regions (P < 0.005), while no differences between regions were observed (P = 0.136). The IZ location did not change (P = 0.283). The number of channels detecting the greatest M-waves significantly decreased (up to 10.7%; P < 0.027) and the centroid longitudinal coordinate shifted distally at 24, 48 and 72 h after EIMD (P < 0.041).

conclusionEIMD consistently changed supramaximal M-waves that were detected mainly proximally from the biceps brachii, suggesting that EIMD takes place locally within the biceps brachii.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorAdultElbowHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle, SkeletalMyalgiaPhysical Conditioning, HumanTorqueEccentric contractionsHigh-density surface electromyographyMuscle damageNeuromuscular electrical stimulation.Ultrasound echo intensity

Identifiers

PMID33070208
OpenAlexW3093354810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.