Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070187›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

The effect of statistical normalization on network propagation scores.

Sergio Picart-Armada, Wesley K Thompson, Alfonso Buil, Alexandre Perera-Lluna

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging role of a systems biology approach to elucidate factors of reduced penetrance: transcriptional changes inMedizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Sergio Picart-ArmadaB2SLab, Departament d'Enginyeria de Sistemes, Automàtica i Informàtica Industrial, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, CIBER-BBN, Barcelona, 08028, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6426-8204
Wesley K ThompsonMental Health Center Sct. Hans, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Alfonso BuilMental Health Center Sct. Hans, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Alexandre Perera-LlunaB2SLab, Departament d'Enginyeria de Sistemes, Automàtica i Informàtica Industrial, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, CIBER-BBN, Barcelona, 08028, Spain.
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESSankt Hans Hospital · DK

Funding

Polygenicity, Pleiotrophy and Power: Novel Statistical Methods for Gene DiscoveryR01GM104400 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI THOMPSON, WESLEY KURT · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationNetwork diffusion and label propagation are fundamental tools in computational biology, with applications like gene-disease association, protein function prediction and module discovery. More recently, several publications have introduced a permutation analysis after the propagation process, due to concerns that network topology can bias diffusion scores. This opens the question of the statistical properties and the presence of bias of such diffusion processes in each of its applications. In this work, we characterized some common null models behind the permutation analysis and the statistical properties of the diffusion scores. We benchmarked seven diffusion scores on three case studies: synthetic signals on a yeast interactome, simulated differential gene expression on a protein-protein interaction network and prospective gene set prediction on another interaction network. For clarity, all the datasets were based on binary labels, but we also present theoretical results for quantitative labels.

resultsDiffusion scores starting from binary labels were affected by the label codification and exhibited a problem-dependent topological bias that could be removed by the statistical normalization. Parametric and non-parametric normalization addressed both points by being codification-independent and by equalizing the bias. We identified and quantified two sources of bias-mean value and variance-that yielded performance differences when normalizing the scores. We provided closed formulae for both and showed how the null covariance is related to the spectral properties of the graph. Despite none of the proposed scores systematically outperformed the others, normalization was preferred when the sought positive labels were not aligned with the bias. We conclude that the decision on bias removal should be problem and data-driven, i.e. based on a quantitative analysis of the bias and its relation to the positive entities. AVAILABILITY: The code is publicly available at https://github.com/b2slab/diffuBench and the data underlying this article are available at https://github.com/b2slab/retroData. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein Interaction MapsDiffusionProspective StudiesProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID33070187
PMCPMC8097756
OpenAlexW3092677284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.