Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33069846›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2020

Low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in plasma of COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department.

R H T Nijhuis, A Russcher, G J de Jong, E Jong, G J M Herder, J A Remijn, S P Verweij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the fully automated, sample-to-result Seegene STARlet-AIOS platform for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus A, influenza virus B, and RSV.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. NADNitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2023
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R H T NijhuisDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Medical Immunology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Rht.nijhuis@meandermc.nl.
A RusscherDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Medical Immunology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
G J de JongDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Medical Immunology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
E JongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
G J M HerderDepartment of Pulmonary Disease, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
J A RemijnDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
S P VerweijDepartment of Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Disease, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correct and reliable identification of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 suspected patients is essential for diagnosis. Respiratory samples should always be tested with real-time PCR for SARS-CoV-2. In addition, blood samples have been tested, but without consistent results and therefore the added value of this sample type is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time PCR in blood samples obtained from PCR-proven COVID-19 patients and in addition to elaborate on the potential use of blood for diagnostics. In this single center study, blood samples drawn from patients at the emergency department with proven COVID-19 infection based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR in respiratory samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. Samples from 118 patients were selected, of which 102 could be included in the study (median age was 65 (IQR 10), 65.7 % men). In six (5.9 %) of the tested samples, SARS-CoV-2 was identified by real-time PCR. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 can be detected by real-time PCR in plasma samples from patients with proven COVID-19, but only in a minority of the patients. Plasma should therefore not be used as primary sample in an acute phase setting to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection. These findings are important to complete the knowledge on possible sample types to test to diagnose COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingEmergency Service, HospitalAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrevalenceRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2ViremiaRNA, ViralBloodCOVIDPlasmaSARS-CoV-2Viremia

Identifiers

PMID33069846
PMCPMC7533651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.