Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33069688›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2020

The anterior thalamic nuclei and nucleus reuniens: So similar but so different.

Mathias L Mathiasen, Shane M O'Mara, John P Aggleton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring memory-related network via dorsal hippocampus suppression.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mathias L MathiasenSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
Shane M O'MaraSchool of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
John P AggletonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK. Electronic address: aggleton@cardiff.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103722/Z14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two thalamic sites are of especial significance for understanding hippocampal - diencephalic interactions: the anterior thalamic nuclei and nucleus reuniens. Both nuclei have dense, direct interconnections with the hippocampal formation, and both are directly connected with many of the same cortical and subcortical areas. These two thalamic sites also contain neurons responsive to spatial stimuli while lesions within these two same areas can disrupt spatial learning tasks that are hippocampal dependent. Despite these many similarities, closer analysis reveals important differences in the details of their connectivity and the behavioural impact of lesions in these two thalamic sites. These nuclei play qualitatively different roles that largely reflect the contrasting relative importance of their medial frontal cortex interactions (nucleus reuniens) compared with their retrosplenial, cingulate, and mammillary body interactions (anterior thalamic nuclei). While the anterior thalamic nuclei are critical for multiple aspects of hippocampal spatial encoding and performance, nucleus reuniens contributes, as required, to aid cognitive control and help select correct from competing memories.

Indexed as

Anterior Thalamic NucleiMidline Thalamic NucleiHippocampusHumansMammillary BodiesNeural PathwaysNeuronsCingulate cortexHippocampusMammillary bodiesMemoryPrefrontal cortexRetrosplenial cortexSpatial memorySubiculumThalamus

Identifiers

PMID33069688
PMCPMC7738755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.