Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33069256›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of health geographics2020

Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics.

Farzana Jahan, Earl W Duncan, Susana M Cramb, Peter D Baade, Kerrie L Mengersen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of health geographics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using Bayesian Meta-Regression to Advance Prevention Science Research: an Introduction and Empirical Illustration.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farzana JahanARC Centre of Excellence in Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. f.jahan@hdr.qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0300-6315
Earl W DuncanARC Centre of Excellence in Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Susana M CrambInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Peter D BaadeCancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Kerrie L MengersenARC Centre of Excellence in Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUCancer Council Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer atlases often provide estimates of cancer incidence, mortality or survival across small areas of a region or country. A recent example of a cancer atlas is the Australian cancer atlas (ACA), that provides interactive maps to visualise spatially smoothed estimates of cancer incidence and survival for 20 different cancer types over 2148 small areas across Australia.

methodsThe present study proposes a multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis model, which can model multiple cancers jointly using summary measures without requiring access to the unit record data. This new approach is illustrated by modelling the publicly available spatially smoothed standardised incidence ratios for multiple cancers in the ACA divided into three groups: common, rare/less common and smoking-related. The multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis models are fitted to each group in order to explore any possible association between the cancers in three remoteness regions: major cities, regional and remote areas across Australia. The correlation between the pairs of cancers included in each multivariate model for a group was examined by computing the posterior correlation matrix for each cancer group in each region. The posterior correlation matrices in different remoteness regions were compared using Jennrich's test of equality of correlation matrices (Jennrich in J Am Stat Assoc. 1970;65(330):904-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1970.10481133 ).

resultsSubstantive correlation was observed among some cancer types. There was evidence that the magnitude of this correlation varied according to remoteness of a region. For example, there has been significant negative correlation between prostate and lung cancer in major cities, but zero correlation found in regional and remote areas for the same pair of cancer types. High risk areas for specific combinations of cancer types were identified and visualised from the proposed model.

conclusionsPublicly available spatially smoothed disease estimates can be used to explore additional research questions by modelling multiple cancer types jointly. These proposed multivariate meta-analysis models could be useful when unit record data are unavailable because of privacy and confidentiality requirements.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAustraliaBayes TheoremHumansIncidenceMaleSmokingCancer atlasCancer incidenceOnline estimates

Identifiers

PMID33069256
PMCPMC7568363
OpenAlexW3092846010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.