Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33069240›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

A non-invasive ultrasound imaging method to measure acute radiation-induced bladder wall thickening in rats.

Antonello E Spinelli, Andrea Bresolin, Stefania Zuppone, Laura Perani, Giuseppe Fallara, Nadia Di Muzio, Riccardo Vago, Claudio Fiorino, Cesare Cozzarini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonello E SpinelliExperimental Imaging Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. spinelli.antonello@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-3426
Andrea BresolinMedical Physics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Stefania ZupponeUrological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Laura PeraniExperimental Imaging Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe FallaraUrological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Nadia Di MuzioRadiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo VagoUrological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Claudio FiorinoMedical Physics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Cesare CozzariniRadiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro 21441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethods for the non-invasive quantification of changes in bladder wall thickness as potential predictors of radiation cystitis in pre-clinical research would be desirable. The use of ultrasound for this aim seems promising, but is still relatively unexplored. A method using ultrasound for bladder wall thickness quantification in rats was developed and applied to measure early radiation-induced bladder wall thickness changes.

methodsTwo groups (n = 9 each) of female Fischer rats were treated with a single radiation dose of 25-30 and 35-40 Gy respectively, using an image-guided micro-irradiator; six untreated rats were monitored as a control group. Empty, half-filled and fully-filled bladder volumes were determined for four non-irradiated rats by measuring axes from ultrasound 3D-images and applying the ellipsoid formula. Mean bladder wall thickness was estimated for both ventral and dorsal bladder sides through the measurement of the bladder wall area along a segment of 4 mm in the central sagittal scan, in order to minimize operator-dependence on the measurement position. Ultrasound acquisitions of all fully-filled rat bladders were also acquired immediately before, and 4 and 28 days after irradiation. Mean bladder wall thickness normalized to the baseline value and corrected for filling were then used to evaluate acute bladder wall thickening and to quantify the dose-effect.

resultsThe relationship between mean bladder wall thickness and volume in unirradiated rats showed that for a bladder volume > 1.5 mL the bladder wall thickness is almost constant and equal to 0.30 mm with variations within ± 15%. The average ratios between post and pre irradiation showed a dose-effect relationship. Bladder wall thickening was observed for the 25-30 Gy and 35-40 Gy groups in 2/9 (22%) and 5/9 (56%) cases at day 4 and in 4/9 (44%) and 8/9 (89%) cases at day 28, respectively. The two groups showed significantly different bladder wall thickness both relative to the control group (p < 0.0001) and between them (p = 0.022). The bladder wall thickness increment was on average 1.32 ± 0.41, and was 1.30 ± 0.21 after 25-30 Gy and 1.47 ± 0.29 and 1.90 ± 0.83 after 35-40 Gy at days 4 and 28 respectively.

conclusionsThe feasibility of using ultrasound on a preclinical rat model to detect bladder wall thickness changes after bladder irradiation was demonstrated, and a clear dose-effect relationship was quantified. Although preliminary, these results are promising in addressing the potential role of this non-invasive approach in quantifying radiation cystitis.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyAnimalsCystitisFemaleRadiation Injuries, ExperimentalRadiotherapy DosageRatsRats, Inbred F344Urinary BladderAnimal modelBladder wall thicknessRadiation cystitisRadiotherapyUltrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID33069240
PMCPMC7568412
OpenAlexW3093018147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.