Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33069233›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Combination of modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and EDTA-CIM (eCIM) for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Ya-Min Tsai, Shining Wang, Hui-Chuan Chiu, Cheng-Yen Kao, Li-Li Wen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic analysis of carbapenem-resistant non-Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Detection of blaJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular characterization of blaBMC infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ya-Min TsaiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, En Chu Kong Hospital, No. 399, Fuxing Rd., Sanxia Dist, New Taipei City, 23702, Taiwan.
Shining WangInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Life Science, National Yang-Ming University, No.155, Sec.2, Linong Street, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Hui-Chuan ChiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, En Chu Kong Hospital, No. 399, Fuxing Rd., Sanxia Dist, New Taipei City, 23702, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yen KaoInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Life Science, National Yang-Ming University, No.155, Sec.2, Linong Street, Taipei, 112, Taiwan. kaocy@ym.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-8782-3912
Li-Li WenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, En Chu Kong Hospital, No. 399, Fuxing Rd., Sanxia Dist, New Taipei City, 23702, Taiwan. eckwen@yahoo.com.
En Chu Kong Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

En Chu Kong hospital, Taiwan ECKH_W10901Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2911-I-010-508Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 109-2320-B-010-036-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbapenemase-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) cause many serious infections resulting in increasing treatment cost, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality rate. Reduced expression and/or mutations of porins and the presence of carbapenemase promote Enterobacteriaceae survival under carbapenem treatments. Development of accurate methods for the detection of antimicrobial resistance is required not only for therapy but also to monitor the spread of resistant bacteria or resistance genes throughout the hospital and community. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the phenotypic methods, Modified Hodge test (MHT), modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), and EDTA-CIM (eCIM) for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).

resultsThe results showed that mCIM had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%, whereas the MHT had a sensitivity of 84.8% and a specificity of 97.8% for the 195 CRE isolates tested (105 CPE and 90 non-CPE isolates). The sensitivity of the mCIM/eCIM to detect metallo-carbapenemases in this study was 89.3% and the specificity was 98.7% as compared to the genotypic PCR detection.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that the mCIM combined with eCIM is useful for detecting and distinguishing different types of carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCarbapenemsEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCarbapenemaseeCIMEnterobacteriaceaemCIMPhenotypic detection

Identifiers

PMID33069233
PMCPMC7568406
OpenAlexW3092826623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.