Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068880›Full record

ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2021

A computational simulation platform for designing real-time monitoring systems with application to COVID-19.

Fatemeh Shahbazi, Masoud Jabbari, Mohammad Nasr Esfahani, Amir Keshmiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Numerical optimization of microfluidic biosensor detection time for the SARS-CoV-2 using the Taguchi method.Indian journal of physics and proceedings of the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science (2004) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. COVID-19 biosensing technologies.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatemeh ShahbaziDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Masoud JabbariDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Mohammad Nasr EsfahaniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Amir KeshmiriDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address: a.keshmiri@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the aim of contributing to the fight against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), numerous strategies have been proposed. While developing an effective vaccine can take months up to years, detection of infected patients seems like one of the best ideas for controlling the situation. The role of biosensors in containing highly pathogenic viruses, saving lives and economy is evident. A new competitive numerical platform specifically for designing microfluidic-integrated biosensors is developed and presented in this work. Properties of the biosensor, sample, buffer fluid and even the microfluidic channel can be modified in this model. This feature provides the scientific community with the ability to design a specific biosensor for requested point-of-care (POC) applications. First, the validation of the presented numerical platform against experimental data and then results and discussion, highlighting the important role of the design parameters on the performance of the biosensor is presented. For the latter, the baseline case has been set on the previous studies on the biosensors suitable for SARS-CoV, which has the highest similarity to the 2019 nCoV. Subsequently, the effects of concentration of the targeted molecules in the sample, installation position and properties of the biosensor on its performance were investigated in 11 case studies. The presented numerical framework provides an insight into understanding of the virus reaction in the design process of the biosensor and enhances our preparation for any future outbreaks. Furthermore, the integration of biosensors with different devices for accelerating the process of defeating the pandemic is proposed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBetacoronavirusBiosensing TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesComputer SimulationComputer SystemsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansHydrodynamicsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPoint-of-Care SystemsSARS-CoV-2BiosensorsComputational fluid dynamicsCOVID-19MicrofluidicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33068880
PMCPMC7550051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.