Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068808›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2020

Comparing regression and neural network techniques for personalized predictive analytics to promote lung protective ventilation in Intensive Care Units.

Rachael Hagan, Charles J Gillan, Ivor Spence, Danny McAuley, Murali Shyamsundar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachael HaganSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Road, Queen's Island, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 3DT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: rhagan09@qub.ac.uk.
Charles J GillanSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Road, Queen's Island, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 3DT, United Kingdom.
Ivor SpenceSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Road, Queen's Island, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 3DT, United Kingdom.
Danny McAuleyThe Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, United Kingdom.
Murali ShyamsundarThe Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving tool and provides organ support for patients with respiratory failure. However, injurious ventilation due to inappropriate delivery of high tidal volume can initiate or potentiate lung injury. This could lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator associated conditions and finally increased mortality. In this study, we explore the viability and compare machine learning methods to generate personalized predictive alerts indicating violation of the safe tidal volume per ideal body weight (IBW) threshold that is accepted as the upper limit for lung protective ventilation (LPV), prior to application to patients. We process streams of patient respiratory data recorded per minute from ventilators in an intensive care unit and apply several state-of-the-art time series prediction methods to forecast the behavior of the tidal volume metric per patient, 1 hour ahead. Our results show that boosted regression delivers better predictive accuracy than other methods that we investigated and requires relatively short execution times. Long short-term memory neural networks can deliver similar levels of accuracy but only after much longer periods of data acquisition, further extended by several hours computing time to train the algorithm. Utilizing Artificial Intelligence, we have developed a personalized clinical decision support tool that can predict tidal volume behavior within 10% accuracy and compare alerts recorded from a real world system to highlight that our models would have predicted violations 1 hour ahead and can therefore conclude that the algorithms can provide clinical decision support.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRespiration, ArtificialHumansIntensive Care UnitsLungNeural Networks, ComputerTidal VolumeAILSTMLung protective ventilationPredictive analyticsRegression

Identifiers

PMID33068808
PMCPMC7543875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.