Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068688›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Refinement and Validation of the Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory.

Jie Deng, Mary S Dietrich, Kenneth J Niermann, Robert J Sinard, Anthony J Cmelak, Sheila H Ridner, Jill Gilbert, Barbara A Murphy

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of validated assessments methods for head and neck lymphedema.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Head and neck lymphedema and quality of life: the patient perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie DengSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: jiedeng@nursing.upenn.edu.
Mary S DietrichSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kenneth J NiermannVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Robert J SinardVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Anthony J CmelakVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sheila H RidnerSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jill GilbertVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Barbara A MurphyVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Establishing Lymphedema and Fibrosis Measures in Oral Cancer PatientsR01DE024982 · NIDCR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DENG, JIE · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLymphedema and fibrosis (LEF) are common yet overlooked late effects of head and neck cancer and its therapy. Lack of reliable and valid measures of head and neck LEF is a critical barrier to the timely identification and management of head and neck LEF. To fill this gap, we developed and pilot tested a 64-item patient-reported outcome measure ( Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Head and Neck, LSIDS-H&N). This article aims to report the process of further validation and refinement of the tool. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted, and 120 patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer were recruited. Participants completed the LSIDS-H&N at pretreatment, end of treatment, and every 3 months up to 12 months after treatment. SAS PROC VARCLUS was used to generate preliminary clusters of item responses. Internal consistency of the item responses within each cluster was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

resultsA total of 117 patients completed the study. The participants reported that the LSIDS-H&N was easy to understand and captured their symptoms and medical conditions. However, >50% of participants indicated that the survey was burdensome due to length. Thus, we proceeded with item reduction, and the shortened tool (33-item) was named Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory (HN-LEF Symptom Inventory). The subsequent exploration of symptom clusters identified 7 symptom domain clusters (eg, soft tissue and neurologic toxicity), all of which demonstrated good internal consistency.

conclusionsThe HN-LEF Symptom Inventory has been carefully developed and refined to allow clinicians and researchers to capture LEF-associated symptom burden and function impairments. Additional rigorous psychometric testing of the tool is ongoing to further validate the strength and internal validity of this tool.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSymptom AssessmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFibrosisHumansLongitudinal StudiesLymphedemaLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33068688
PMCPMC9059777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.