ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)
Diuretic therapy and exercise performance.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the Mechanisms and Treatment of Heart Failure: Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models with a Focus on SGLT2 Inhibitors and Sex-Specific Differences.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Peak week recommendations for bodybuilders: an evidence based approach.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2021Review
- The abuse of diuretics as performance-enhancing drugs and masking agents in sport doping: pharmacology, toxicology and analysis.British journal of pharmacology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drugs that induce an increased urine flow are used both legitimately (treatment of hypertension and oedema) and otherwise (rapid weight loss) in sports and exercise. There are 5 major categories of diuretic drugs based on their mechanisms and loci of action. Common to all classes is hypohydration, which has been shown to have an array of adverse effects on performance, including impaired strength, power and endurance. Postural hypotension can be particularly troublesome in the elderly. Also common to all diuretics, except those interfering with the aldosterone mechanism in the distal nephron, is hypokalaemia. Severe symptomatic hypokalaemia (serum K+ concentration less than 3.0 mmol/L) is rare except in clinical situations in which additional hypokalaemic factors are present. Moderate levels of hypokalaemia (serum K+ concentration 3.0 to 3.5 mmol/L) can increase the risk of adverse reactions as has been shown in a variety of prospective clinical studies. Hypokalaemia has effects on cardiac rhythm, muscle function and integrity, local blood flow, carbohydrate metabolism, and the blood lipid profile. Performance studies generally show diminished exercise tolerance in direct proportion to the degree of hypohydration induced. This is not the case, however, in a clinical setting of compromised cardiopulmonary function, in which diuresis has direct and indirect inotropic effects which augment exercise tolerance and decrease symptoms. The ability of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide, to induce a hyperventilatory response to the obligatory metabolic acidosis is taken advantage of in mountaineering to prevent or ameliorate the symptoms of acute mountain sickness, thereby improving exercise performance at high altitude. It is suggested that in clinical situations in which the use of a diuretic is considered appropriate, every effort be made to maintain or restore the serum concentration and the total body store of potassium to normal. To some degree this can be accomplished through diet, although potassium chloride supplements or potassium-sparing diuretics or diuretic combinations may be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.