Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068666›Full record

ArticleAppetite2021

Food choice motives and the nutritional quality of diet during the COVID-19 lockdown in France.

Lucile Marty, Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain, Maë Labesse, Sophie Nicklaus

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
38.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucile MartyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK; Centre des Sciences Du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Agrosup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 17 Rue Sully, 21065, Dijon Cedex, France. Electronic address: lucile.marty@inrae.fr.
Blandine de Lauzon-GuillainUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRAE, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94807, Villejuif Cedex, France.
Maë LabesseCentre des Sciences Du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Agrosup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 17 Rue Sully, 21065, Dijon Cedex, France.
Sophie NicklausCentre des Sciences Du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Agrosup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 17 Rue Sully, 21065, Dijon Cedex, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To limit the transmission of COVID-19, nationwide lockdown was imposed in France between March, 17th and May 10th, 2020. This disruption in individuals' daily routines likely altered food consumption habits. We examined how changes in food choice motives related to changes in nutritional quality during the lockdown compared to before. A convenience sample of 938 French adults completed online questionnaires on the Qualtrics platform at the end of April 2020. Participants were retrospectively asked about their food choice motives and food consumption during the month before and in the first month of the lockdown. The importance of nine food choice motives was assessed: health, convenience, sensory appeal, natural content, ethical concern, weight control, mood, familiarity, and price, scoring from 1 to 4. Food intakes were recorded using a food frequency questionnaire including 110 foods, 12 non-alcoholic beverages and 4 alcoholic beverages. Adherence to the French dietary recommendations before and during the lockdown was estimated using the simplified PNNS-GS2, scoring from -17 to 11.5. The nutritional quality of diet was lower during the lockdown compared to before (-0.32, SD 2.28, p < 0.001). Food choice motives significantly changed and an increase in the importance of weight control was associated with increased nutritional quality (β = 0.89, p < 0.001, partial η

Indexed as

MotivationAdultChoice BehaviorCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleFood PreferencesFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritive ValueQuarantineSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Food choice motivesLockdownNutritional quality

Identifiers

PMID33068666
PMCPMC7558232
OpenAlexW3093306647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.