ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Extreme Antagonism Arising from Gene-Environment Interactions.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data-driven analysis reveals distinct genomic and environmental contributions to bacterial growth curves.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancement and mapping of tolerance to salt stress and 5-fluorocytosine in synthetic yeast strains via SCRaMbLE.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2022Article
- Contrasting tourism regimes due to the COVID-19 lockdown reveal varied genomic toxicity in a tropical beach in the Southern Atlantic.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2022Article
- Cross-species metabolomic analysis of tau- and DDT-related toxicity.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Dissecting the Fitness Costs of Complex Mutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Antagonistic interactions in biological systems, which occur when one perturbation blunts the effect of another, are typically interpreted as evidence that the two perturbations impact the same cellular pathway or function. Yet, this interpretation ignores extreme antagonistic interactions wherein an otherwise deleterious perturbation compensates for the function lost because of a prior perturbation. Here, we report on gene-environment interactions involving genetic mutations that are deleterious in a permissive environment but beneficial in a specific environment that restricts growth. These extreme antagonistic interactions constitute gene-environment analogs of synthetic rescues previously observed for gene-gene interactions. Our approach uses two independent adaptive evolution steps to address the lack of experimental methods to systematically identify such extreme interactions. We apply the approach to Escherichia coli by successively adapting it to defined glucose media without and with the antibiotic rifampicin. The approach identified multiple mutations that are beneficial in the presence of rifampicin and deleterious in its absence. The analysis of transcription shows that the antagonistic adaptive mutations repress a stringent response-like transcriptional program, whereas nonantagonistic mutations have an opposite transcriptional profile. Our approach represents a step toward the systematic characterization of extreme antagonistic gene-drug interactions, which can be used to identify targets to select against antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.