Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068528›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Vertical transmission of Zika virus and its outcomes: a Bayesian synthesis of prospective studies.

A E Ades, Antoni Soriano-Arandes, Ana Alarcon, Francesco Bonfante, Claire Thorne, Catherine S Peckham, Carlo Giaquinto

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Arboviruses and pregnancy: are the threats visible or hidden?Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

A E AdesDepartment of Population Health Science, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: t.ades@bristol.ac.uk.
Antoni Soriano-ArandesPediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunodeficiencies Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana AlarconDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Joan de Déu Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesco BonfanteLaboratory of Experimental Animal Models, Division of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Italy.
Claire ThornePopulation Policy and Practice Programme, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Catherine S PeckhamPopulation Policy and Practice Programme, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Carlo GiaquintoDipartimento di Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Padua · ITVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U145079307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProspective studies of Zika virus in pregnancy have reported rates of congenital Zika syndrome and other adverse outcomes by trimester. However, Zika virus can infect and damage the fetus early in utero, but clear before delivery. The true vertical transmission rate is therefore unknown. We aimed to provide the first estimates of underlying vertical transmission rates and adverse outcomes due to congenital infection with Zika virus by trimester of exposure.

methodsThis was a Bayesian latent class analysis of data from seven prospective studies of Zika virus in pregnancy. We estimated vertical transmission rates, rates of Zika-virus-related and non-Zika-virus-related adverse outcomes, and the diagnostic sensitivity of markers of congenital infection. We allowed for variation between studies in these parameters and used information from women in comparison groups with no PCR-confirmed infection, where available.

findingsThe estimated mean risk of vertical transmission was 47% (95% credible interval 26 to 76) following maternal infection in the first trimester, 28% (15 to 46) in the second, and 25% (13 to 47) in the third. 9% (4 to 17) of deliveries following infections in the first trimester had symptoms consistent with congenital Zika syndrome, 3% (1 to 7) in the second, and 1% (0 to 3) in the third. We estimated that in infections during the first, second, and third trimester, respectively, 13% (2 to 27), 3% (-5 to 14), and 0% (-7 to 11) of pregnancies had adverse outcomes attributable to Zika virus infection. Diagnostic sensitivity of markers of congenital infection was lowest in the first trimester (42% [18 to 72]), but increased to 85% (51 to 99) in trimester two, and 80% (42 to 99) in trimester three. There was substantial between-study variation in the risks of vertical transmission and congenital Zika syndrome.

interpretationThis preliminary analysis recovers the causal effects of Zika virus from disparate study designs. Higher transmission in the first trimester is unusual with congenital infections but accords with laboratory evidence of decreasing susceptibility of placental cells to infection during pregnancy.

fundingEuropean Union Horizon 2020 programme.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalLatent Class AnalysisPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy TrimestersProspective StudiesZika VirusZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID33068528
PMCPMC7992034
OpenAlexW3023154420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.