Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068283›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2020

Rechallenge with Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): Results from South Australia mCRC Registry.

Li Chia Chong, Jennifer E Hardingham, Amanda R Townsend, Cynthia Piantadosi, Gonzalo Tapia Rico, Chris Karapetis, Rob Padbury, Guy Maddern, Amitesh Roy, Timothy J Price

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li Chia ChongDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jennifer E HardinghamDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Amanda R TownsendDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Cynthia PiantadosiDepartment of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Gonzalo Tapia RicoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Chris KarapetisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Rob PadburyDepartment of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Guy MaddernDepartment of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Amitesh RoyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Timothy J PriceDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Timothy.Price@sa.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-2693
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · AUFlinders Medical Centre · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) are today increasingly used in the first- or second-line setting for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Following progression beyond third- or fourth-line therapy, some patients are unsuitable for further chemotherapy because of poor performance status or patient choice. However, a significant number of patients are still candidates for further therapy despite limited standard options being available. The role of rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy, particularly in patients who had previously responded, is often considered, but there is limited evidence in the literature to support such a strategy.

objectiveThis retrospective study aims to review the outcome of metastatic CRC patients who had anti-EGFR rechallenge. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients who had been rechallenged with anti-EGFR therapy were identified from the South Australian metastatic CRC database. Patient characteristics were recorded and tumor response was retrospectively assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess progression free survival (PFS) for each rechallenge and overall survival (OS).

resultsTwenty-two patients were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Disease control rate (stable disease and partial response) was 45.4% (ten patients) for patients who received rechallenge anti-EGFR. Seven patients received a second rechallenge and disease control rate was 28.6% (two patients). The median interval time between initial anti-EGFR therapy and rechallenge was 13.5 months. The median PFS after rechallenge 1 was 4.1 months and after rechallenge 2 was 3.5 months. The median OS was 7.7 months from date of rechallenge.

conclusionsAnti-EGFR rechallenge provides clinical benefit in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic CRC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSouth AustraliaAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID33068283
OpenAlexW3092816113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.