Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068275›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2021

The clinical obesity maintenance model: a structural equation model.

Dean Spirou, Evelyn Smith, Katie Wood, Jayanthi Raman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health literacy and obesity: A systematic scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dean SpirouDiscipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7073-7356
Evelyn SmithSchool of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9142-986X
Katie WoodDiscipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jayanthi RamanDiscipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. jayanthi.raman@uts.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1320-6177
University of Technology Sydney · AUTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTheoretical research on the psychological underpinnings of weight management is limited. Recently, the clinical obesity maintenance model (COMM) proposed a theoretical conceptualisation of salient psychological and neuropsychological mechanisms maintaining weight management issues. The current study aimed to empirically test the COMM and elucidate the results in the context of recent empirical findings.

methodsParticipants (N = 165) were recruited from university and community settings in Australia. The sample consisted of adults with normal weight (n = 41), overweight (n = 40), and obesity (n = 84). Participants completed self-report questionnaires and a brief neuropsychological test. Structural equation modelling was used to estimate the associations between the hypothesised variables of the COMM and evaluate the model fit.

resultsFindings suggested acceptable to good model fit. Furthermore, several direct effects were found. First, cognitive flexibility directly affected eating habit strength. Second, eating habit strength directly affected eating beliefs. Third, eating beliefs directly affected emotion dysregulation. Fourth, emotion dysregulation directly affected depression and binge eating with depression partially mediating this relationship. Finally, depression directly affected binge eating.

conclusionThis was the first study to empirically test the COMM. Overall, findings provide preliminary support for the COMM as a psychological model of weight management and highlight the underlying psychological and neuropsychological mechanisms that may contribute to weight management issues. As this study examined a simplified version of the COMM, future research should continue evaluating this model and consider incorporating these components into more holistic weight management models to improve long-term treatment outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderBulimiaAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansObesitySurveys and QuestionnairesObesityPsychological factorsWeight maintenanceWeight management

Identifiers

PMID33068275
OpenAlexW3093345297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.