ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2021
Predicting Hot Spot Residues at Protein-DNA Binding Interfaces Based on Sequence Information.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twenty years of advances in prediction of nucleic acid-binding residues in protein sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Prediction of Protein-DNA Interface Hot Spots Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and Machine Learning.Genes · 2024Article
- Prediction of hot spots in protein-DNA binding interfaces based on discrete wavelet transform and wavelet packet transform.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hot spot residues at protein-DNA binding interfaces are hugely important for investigating the underlying mechanism of molecular recognition. Currently, there are a few tools available for identifying the hot spot residues in the protein-DNA complexes. In addition, the three-dimensional protein structures are needed in these tools. However, it is well known that the three-dimensional structures are unavailable for most proteins. Considering the limitation, we proposed a method, named SPDH, for predicting hot spot residues only based on protein sequences. Firstly, we obtained 133 features from physicochemical property, conservation, predicted solvent accessible surface area and structure. Then, we systematically assessed these features based on various feature selection methods to obtain the optimal feature subset and compared the models using four classical machine learning algorithms (support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression, and k-nearest neighbor) on the training dataset. We found that the variability of physicochemical property features between wild and mutative types was important on improving the performance of the prediction model. On the independent test set, our method achieved the performance with AUC of 0.760 and sensitivity of 0.808, and outperformed other methods. The data and source code can be downloaded at https://github.com/xialab-ahu/SPDH .
Indexed as
Identifiers
33068261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.