Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068186›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) MRA combined with MRI-based vascular calcification visualization for the assessment of arterial stenosis in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease.

Akos Varga-Szemes, Megha Penmetsa, Tilman Emrich, Thomas M Todoran, Pal Suranyi, Stephen R Fuller, Robert R Edelman, Ioannis Koktzoglou, U Joseph Schoepf

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Akos Varga-SzemesDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Megha PenmetsaDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Tilman EmrichDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Thomas M TodoranDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Pal SuranyiDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Stephen R FullerDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Robert R EdelmanDepartment of Radiology, NorthShore University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Ioannis KoktzoglouDepartment of Radiology, NorthShore University, Evanston, IL, USA.
U Joseph SchoepfDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. schoepf@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6164-5641
Medical University of South Carolina · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Nonenhanced 3T QISS MR Angiography of the Peripheral ArteriesR01HL130093 · NHLBI · ENDEAVOR HEALTH CLINICAL OPERATIONS · PI EDELMAN, ROBERT R. · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130093Siemens USA n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe proton density-weighted, in-phase stack-of-stars (PDIP-SOS) MRI technique provides calcification visualization in peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a combined non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) MRA and PDIP-SOS MRI protocol for the detection of PAD, in comparison with CTA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

methodsTwenty-six prospectively enrolled PAD patients (70 ± 8 years) underwent lower extremity CTA and 1.5-T or 3-T PDIP-SOS/QISS MRI prior to DSA. Two readers rated image quality and graded stenosis (≥ 50%) on QISS MRA without/with calcification visualization. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated against DSA. Calcification was quantified and compared between MRI and non-contrast CT (NCCT) using paired t test, Pearson's correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis.

resultsImage quality ratings were significantly higher for CTA compared to those for MRA (4.0 [3.0-4.0] and 3.0 [3.0-4.0]; p = 0.0369). The sensitivity and specificity of QISS MRA, QISS MRA with PDIP-SOS, and CTA for ≥ 50% stenosis detection were 85.4%, 92.2%, and 90.2%, and 90.3%, 93.2%, and 94.2%, respectively, while AUCs were 0.879, 0.928, and 0.923, respectively. A significant increase in AUC was observed when PDIP-SOS was added to the MRA protocol (p = 0.0266). Quantification of calcification showed significant differences between PDIP-SOS and NCCT (80.6 ± 31.2 mm

conclusionQISS MRA combined with PDIP-SOS MRI provides improved, CTA equivalent, accuracy for the detection of PAD, although its image quality remains inferior to CTA. KEY POINTS: • Agreement in stenosis detection rate using non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective MRA compared to DSA improved when calcification visualization was provided to the readers. • An increase was observed in both sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ≥ 50% stenosis when MRI-based calcification assessment was added to the protocol, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy more comparable to CTA. • Quantification of calcification showed statistical difference between MRI and non-contrast CT; however, a high correlation was observed between the techniques.

Indexed as

Peripheral Arterial DiseaseVascular CalcificationAngiography, Digital SubtractionConstriction, PathologicContrast MediaHumansLower ExtremityMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaComputed tomography angiographyMagnetic resonance imagingNon-contrast magnetic resonance angiographyPeripheral artery diseaseVascular calcification

Identifiers

PMID33068186
PMCPMC8043975
OpenAlexW3092667943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.