Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068133›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Feasibility and safety of antepartum tactile imaging.

Zdenek Rusavy, Vladimir Kalis, Salavat Aglyamov, Vladimir Egorov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Vaginal tactile imaging: A review.Pelviperineology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zdenek RusavyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. rusavyz@fnplzen.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-7125-9819
Vladimir KalisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Salavat AglyamovUniversity of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Vladimir EgorovAdvanced Tactile Imaging, Trenton, NJ, USA.

Funding

Antepartum tactile imager for minimizing risk of maternal childbirth traumaR43HD095223 · NICHD · ADVANCED TACTILE IMAGING, INC. · PI EGOROV, VLADIMIR · 2018 to 2018
$238k
NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD095223NICHD NIH HHS R43HD095223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisQuantitative characterization of the birth canal and critical structures before delivery may provide risk assessment for maternal birth injury. The objective of this study was to explore imaging capability of an antepartum tactile imaging (ATI) probe.

methodsTwenty randomly selected women older than 21 years with completed 35th week of pregnancy and a premise of vaginal delivery were enrolled in the feasibility study. The biomechanical data were acquired using the ATI probe with a double-curved surface, shaped according to the fetal skull and equipped with 168 tactile sensors and an electromagnetic motion tracking sensor. Software package COMSOL Multiphysics was used for finite element modeling. Subjects were asked for assessment of pain and comfort levels experienced during the ATI examination.

resultsAll 20 nulliparous women were successfully examined with the ATI. Mean age was 27.8 ± 4.1 years, BMI 30.7 ± 5.8, and week of pregnancy 38.8 ± 1.4. Biomechanical mapping with the ATI allowed real-time observation of the probe location, applied load to the vaginal walls, and a 3D tactile image composition. The nonlinear finite element model describing the stress-strain relationship of the pelvic tissue was developed and used for calculation of Young's modulus (E). Average perineal elastic modulus was 11.1 ± 4.3 kPa, levator ani 4.8 ± 2.4 kPa, and symphysis-perineum distance was 30.1 ± 6.9 mm. The pain assessment level for the ATI examination was 2.1 ± 0.8 (scale 1-4); the comfort level was 2.05 ± 0.69 (scale 1-3).

conclusionsThe antepartum examination with the ATI probe allowed measurement of the tissue elasticity and anatomical distances. The pain level was low and the comfort level was comparable with manual palpation.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesPelvic FloorAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalParturitionPerineumPregnancyYoung AdultBiomechanics of parturitionElastographyFinite element modelPerineal elasticityTactile imaging

Identifiers

PMID33068133
PMCPMC8295083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.