Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068065›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2020

Associations between phenotypic characteristics and clinical parameters of broilers and intestinal microbial development throughout a production cycle: A field study.

Jannigje G Kers, Jean E de Oliveira, Egil A J Fischer, Monique H G Tersteeg-Zijderveld, Prokopis Konstanti, Jan Arend Arjan Stegeman, Hauke Smidt, Francisca C Velkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DietaryFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. No colonization resistance toFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jannigje G KersDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Division of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9951-7549
Jean E de OliveiraCargill Animal Nutrition and Health, Innovation Center Velddriel, Velddriel, The Netherlands.
Egil A J FischerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Division of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0599-701X
Monique H G Tersteeg-ZijderveldDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Prokopis KonstantiLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7160-1696
Jan Arend Arjan StegemanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Division of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-5026
Francisca C VelkersDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Division of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2923-3233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disturbances in intestinal health are a common problem affecting commercial broiler chickens worldwide. Several studies have revealed associations between health, production performance, and intestinal microbiota. This study aimed to describe the development of the intestinal microbiota of broilers within a production cycle to evaluate to what extent clinical parameters and phenotypic characteristics can explain the intestinal microbiota variation. Of four well-performing flocks within two farms, the cecal content was collected of nine broilers at 0, 2, 4, or 5, 7, 11, or 12, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 40 days of the production cycle. In total, 342 samples were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing. Variables as macroscopic gut abnormalities, gut lesions, age, individual body weight, sex, footpad integrity, the color of ceca, and foam in cecal content were determined. Ileum tissue was collected for histological quantification of villus length and crypt depth. Flock infection levels of the intestinal disease coccidiosis were measured in pooled feces from the poultry house. Increases in phylogenetic diversity were observed from hatch until day 21 of age. Constrained multivariate analysis indicated that age, farm, body weight, ileum crypt depth, cecal color, and the coccidiosis lesion score were important variables to describe the variation in cecal microbiota. These results contribute to determining relevant variables in flocks that may be indicative of the intestinal microbiota composition. Moreover, this knowledge increases the awareness of interactions between the intestinal microbiota and broiler health as well as their relative importance.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaCecumChickensCoccidiosisDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHealth StatusIntestinal MucosaPoultry DiseasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA genececal microbiotafield studyphenotypespoultry

Identifiers

PMID33068065
PMCPMC7658455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.