Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33067866›Full record

Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2020

Examination of Metoprolol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Across CYP2D6 Genotype-Derived Activity Scores.

Cameron D Thomas, Scott A Mosley, Sarah Kim, Karthik Lingineni, Nihal El Rouby, Taimour Y Langaee, Yan Gong, Danxin Wang, Siegfried O Schmidt, Philip F Binkley and 15 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. CYP2D6 Metabolizer Status and Mortality in Metoprolol Users.Clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Metoprolol andJournal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Cameron D ThomasDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Scott A MosleyDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Sarah KimDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Karthik LingineniDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Nihal El RoubyDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Taimour Y LangaeeDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Yan GongDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Danxin WangDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Siegfried O SchmidtDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Philip F BinkleyDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
David S EstoresDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Kairui FengOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Hyewon KimOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Minori KinjoOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Zhichuan LiOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Lanyan FangOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Arlene B ChapmanBiological Sciences Division, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoffDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
John G GumsDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Issam S HamadehDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Liang ZhaoOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Stephan SchmidtDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Reginald F FryeDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Julie A JohnsonDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Larisa H CavallariDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive ResponsesU01GM074492 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI COOPER-DEHOFF, RHONDA M, JOHNSON, JULIE A. · 2005 to 2014
$20.7M
Training Program for Applied Research and Development in Genomic MedicineT32HG008958 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Larisa Humma Cavallari, Stephen E. Kimmel · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Studies of Cardiovascular Drugs (U01)U01FD005235 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CAVALLARI, LARISA HUMMA · 2014 to 2017
$2.5M
FDA HHS 1U01 FD005235FDA HHS U01 FD005235NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG008958NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM074492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent CYP2D6 phenotype standardization efforts by CYP2D6 activity score (AS) are based on limited pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Using data from two independent clinical trials of metoprolol, we compared metoprolol PK and PD across CYP2D6 AS with the goal of determining whether the PK and PD data support the new phenotype classification. S-metoprolol apparent oral clearance (CLo), adjusted for clinical factors, was correlated with CYP2D6 AS (P < 0.001). The natural log of CLo was lower with an AS of 1 (7.6 ± 0.4 mL/minute) vs. 2-2.25 (8.3 ± 0.6 mL/minute; P = 0.012), similar between an AS of 1 and 1.25-1.5 (7.8 ± 0.5 mL/minute; P = 0.702), and lower with an AS of 1.25-1.5 vs. 2-2.25 (P = 0.03). There was also a greater reduction in heart rate with metoprolol among study participants with AS of 1 (-10.8 ± 5.5) vs. 2-2.25 (-7.1 ± 5.6; P < 0.001) and no significant difference between those with an AS of 1 and 1.25-1.5 (-9.2 ± 4.7; P = 0.095). These data highlight linear trends among CYP2D6 AS and metoprolol PK and PD, but inconsistencies with the phenotypes assigned by AS based on the current standards. Overall, this case study with metoprolol suggests that utilizing CYP2D6 AS, instead of collapsing AS into phenotype categories, may be the most precise approach for utilizing CYP2D6 pharmacogenomics in clinical practice.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdministration, OralAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdultAgedBlood PressureCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6FemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMetoprololMiddle AgedPharmacogeneticsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Metoprolol

Identifiers

PMID33067866
PMCPMC7762806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.