Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33067726›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

Pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Benjamin Pradere, David D'Andrea, Victor M Schuettfort, Beat Foerster, Fahad Quhal, Keiichiro Mori, Mohammad Abufaraj, Vitaly Margulis, Marine Deuker, Alberto Briganti and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 13 countries.

Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-8558
David D'AndreaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Victor M SchuettfortDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Beat FoersterDepartment of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Fahad QuhalDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Mohammad AbufarajDepartment of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Vitaly MargulisDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Marine DeukerCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Alberto BrigantiDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Tim MuilwijkDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kees HendricksenDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Pierre KarakiewicDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.
UTUC collaboration
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Jordan · JOVienna General Hospital · ATJikei University School of Medicine · JPKantonsspital Winterthur · CHKing Fahad Specialist Hospital · SAKU Leuven · BEThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversité de Tours · FRVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe accurate selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important challenge in oncology. Serum AGR has been found to be associated with oncological outcomes in various malignancies. We assessed the association of pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) with pathologic response and oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically non-metastatic UTUC.

methodsWe retrospectively included all clinically non-metastatic patients from a multicentric database who had neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy and RNU for UTUC. After assessing the pretreatment AGR cut-off value, we found 1.42 to have the maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two AGR groups using this cut-off (low, < 1.42 vs high, ≥ 1.42). A logistic regression was performed to measure the association with pathologic response after NAC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association of AGR with OS and RFS.

resultsOf 172 patients, 58 (34%) patients had an AGR < 1.42. Median follow-up was 26 (IQR 11-56) months. In logistic regression, low AGR was not associated with pathologic response. On univariable analyses, pre-therapy serum AGR was neither associated with OS HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.74; p = 0.47) nor RFS HR 1.48 (95% CI 0.98-1.22; p = 0.06). These results remained true regardless of the response to NAC.

conclusionPre-therapy low serum AGR before NAC followed by RNU for clinically high-risk UTUC was not associated with pathological response or long-term oncological outcomes. Biomarkers that can complement clinical factors in UTUC are needed as clinical staging and risk stratification are still suboptimal leading to both over and under treatment despite the availability of effective therapies.

Indexed as

NephroureterectomyAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellGlobulinsHumansKidney NeoplasmsMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminTreatment OutcomeUreteral NeoplasmsGlobulinsSerum AlbuminAGRBiomarkerNeoadjuvantUrothelialUTUC

Identifiers

PMID33067726
PMCPMC8332553
OpenAlexW3092865891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.