Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33067582›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2021

The importance of genomic variation for biodiversity, ecosystems and people.

Madlen Stange, Rowan D H Barrett, Andrew P Hendry

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Natural variants ofScience advances · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patterns of Genetic and Clonal Diversity inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Drivers of genetic diversity across the marine tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madlen StangeRedpath Museum, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-2535
Rowan D H BarrettRedpath Museum, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-2531
Andrew P HendryRedpath Museum, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. andrew.hendry@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2019 United Nations Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services estimated that approximately 1 million species are at risk of extinction. This primarily human-driven loss of biodiversity has unprecedented negative consequences for ecosystems and people. Classic and emerging approaches in genetics and genomics have the potential to dramatically improve these outcomes. In particular, the study of interactions among genetic loci within and between species will play a critical role in understanding the adaptive potential of species and communities, and hence their direct and indirect effects on biodiversity, ecosystems and people. We explore these population and community genomic contexts in the hope of finding solutions for maintaining and improving ecosystem services and nature's contributions to people.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemGenetic VariationAnimalsEnvironmental HealthEvolution, MolecularGenetic EngineeringHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.