Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33067574›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2021

Efficacy and safety profile of deep responders to carfilzomib-based therapy: a subgroup analysis from ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR.

Katja Weisel, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Francesca Gay, Michel Delforge, Gordon Cook, Zsolt Szabo, Renaud Desgraz, Lucy DeCosta, Philippe Moreau

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01080391 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study Comparing Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Subjects With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2010 to 2017Enrolled792ConditionsRelapsed Multiple MyelomaArmsDexamethasone, Lenalidomide, Carfilzomib
NCT01568866 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib Plus Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2012 to 2018Enrolled929ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsCarfilzomib, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katja WeiselDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Medical Center of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. k.weisel@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-6614
Maria-Victoria MateosInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Cancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), and Hematology Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-1218
Francesca GayMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Michel DelforgeDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital (UZ) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gordon CookDepartment of Haematology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1717-0412
Zsolt SzaboAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Renaud DesgrazAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Lucy DeCostaGlobal Biostatistical Science, Amgen Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Philippe MoreauHematology Department, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the profile of best responders (complete response or better [≥CR]) to carfilzomib, we described the characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) data, and the safety of patients who achieved ≥CR to carfilzomib-based treatment in ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR. In post hoc analyses from ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR, median PFS and OS were longer for ≥CR patients versus those who achieved a very good partial response or partial response (VGPR/PR). In the carfilzomib arm of ASPIRE, median PFS was 50.4 months for ≥CR versus 22.1 months for VGPR/PR; median OS was 67.0 versus 44.2 months, respectively. In the carfilzomib arm of ENDEAVOR, median PFS was 34.0 for ≥CR versus 20.4 months for VGPR/PR; median OS was non-estimable. Despite the longer treatment duration, fewer patients with ≥CR versus VGPR/PR experienced treatment-emergent adverse events that led to discontinuation of carfilzomib-based treatment in ASPIRE or ENDEAVOR. Low serum lactate dehydrogenase was the only factor associated with achieving ≥CR vs patients not achieving CR in ASPIRE in multivariate regression analyses. No association was found between cytogenetic risk status and reaching ≥CR. Carfilzomib treatment may lead to rapid and deep responses, irrespective of most patient characteristics.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDexamethasoneFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaOligopeptidesPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopiccarfilzomibDexamethasoneLenalidomideOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID33067574
PMCPMC8179852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.