ArticleScientific reports2020
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the pancreas at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of Intrapancreatic Fat Deposition on Regional and Total Pancreatic T1 Relaxation Times at 3.0 Tesla MRI.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Advancements in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases: A comparative review and study on future insights.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Whole pancreas water TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Simultaneous Multiparameter Mapping of the Liver in a Single Breath-Hold or Respiratory-Triggered Acquisition Using Multi-Inversion Spin and Gradient Echo MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- An endoscopic ultrasound-based interpretable deep learning model and nomogram for distinguishing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in MRI of Chronic Pancreatitis.Advances in clinical radiology · 2024Article
- T1 and T2-mapping in pancreatic MRI: Current evidence and future perspectives.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Noninvasive assessment of organ-specific and shared pathways in multi-organ fibrosis using T1 mapping.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Emerging Trends in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Quantitative Biomedical Imaging Applications: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comparing Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) and the MAGiC Sequence for Simultaneous T1 and T2 Quantitative Measurements in the Female Pelvis: A Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Test-retest assessment of non-contrast MRI sequences to characterise and quantify the small bowel wall in healthy participants.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Accelerated 3D whole-brain T1, T2, and proton density mapping: feasibility for clinical glioma MR imaging.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Review
- Fast and accurate modeling of transient-state, gradient-spoiled sequences by recurrent neural networks.NMR in biomedicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas is increasingly used as an important diagnostic modality for characterisation of pancreatic lesions. Pancreatic MRI protocols are mostly qualitative due to time constraints and motion sensitivity. MR Fingerprinting is an innovative acquisition technique that provides qualitative data and quantitative parameter maps from a single free-breathing acquisition with the potential to reduce exam times. This work investigates the feasibility of MRF parameter mapping for pancreatic imaging in the presence of free-breathing exam. Sixteen healthy participants were prospectively imaged using MRF framework. Regions-of-interest were drawn in multiple solid organs including the pancreas and T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.