Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33067492›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Tactile to visual number priming in the left intraparietal cortex of sighted Braille readers.

Katarzyna Rączy, Maria Czarnecka, Małgorzata Paplińska, Guido Hesselmann, André Knops, Marcin Szwed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katarzyna RączyDepartment of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. raczy.katarzyna@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8208-1761
Maria CzarneckaDepartment of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Małgorzata PaplińskaThe Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland.
Guido HesselmannDepartment of General and Biological Psychology, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
André KnopsLaPsyDÉ, UMR CNRS 8240, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Marcin SzwedDepartment of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numbers can be presented in different notations and sensory modalities. It is currently debated to what extent these formats overlap onto a single representation. We asked whether such an overlap exists between symbolic numbers represented in two sensory modalities: Arabic digits and Braille numbers. A unique group of sighted Braille readers underwent extensive Braille reading training and was tested in an fMRI repetition-suppression paradigm with tactile Braille digit primes and visual Arabic digit targets. Our results reveal cross-modal priming: compared to repetition of two different quantities (e.g., Braille "5" and Arabic "2"), repetition of the same quantity presented in two modalities (e.g., Braille "5" and Arabic "5") led to a reduction of activation in several sub-regions of the Intraparietal Sulcus (IPS), a key cortical region for magnitude processing. Thus, in sighted Braille readers, the representations of numbers read by sight and by touch overlap to a degree sufficient to cause repetition suppression. This effect was modulated by the numerical prime-probe distance. Altogether this indicates that the left parietal cortex hosts neural assemblies that are sensitive to numerical information from different notations (number words or Arabic digits) and modalities (tactile and visual).

Indexed as

ReadingSensory AidsAcoustic StimulationAdultCuesDominance, CerebralFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingParietal LobeRepetition PrimingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33067492
PMCPMC7567860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.