Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33067469›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2020

Monitoring of inhaler use at home with a smartphone video application in a pilot study.

Nagesh Dhadge, Madhuragauri Shevade, Nisha Kale, Govinda Narke, Dhananjay Pathak, Monica Barne, Sapna Madas, Sundeep Salvi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Nurse Perspectives Regarding Implementation of an Asthma Monitoring Mobile Health Application in the School Setting.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nagesh DhadgeCentral Health Services, Pune, India. ndhadge@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1457-2715
Madhuragauri ShevadeChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
Nisha KaleChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
Govinda NarkeChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
Dhananjay PathakChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
Monica BarneChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4962-7985
Sapna MadasChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
Sundeep SalviChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
National Chemical Laboratory · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalation therapy is the basis of the pharmacological management of asthma and COPD. Most patients are trained on the correct use of inhalers by health professionals but after that do patients continue to take them correctly at home remains largely unknown. Video recording of the inhalation technique using a smartphone can be used to evaluate the inhaler technique at home. Through this pilot study, we aimed to understand whether inhaler training given to patients in the outpatient clinic translates into good inhalation practices at home by a video application platform using a smartphone. We recruited 70 newly diagnosed asthma and COPD patients and a pulmonologist trained them to use their inhaler until they were able to use it correctly. Videos of inhaler use were captured by a relative or a friend at home and then sent to an independent reviewer via WhatsApp on Days 1, 7, 14 and 28 (±2). Each step of the inhaler technique was evaluated based on a predetermined checklist with a rating scale of 0 to 10 (10 for all steps done correctly). Out of 70 patients recruited, 30 (42%) sent all videos. We found that, although all patients performed all the steps correctly in the clinic, none of them performed all steps correctly at home even on Day 1 itself of the inhaler use. On Day 1, the steps score reduced from 10 to 6.9 with a downward trend until Day 28. The most common mistakes from Day 1 onwards were incorrect inspiratory flow rates and not gargling after the inhaler use. Also, most patients showed partially effective inhalation as per our scoring method. Remote video monitoring of inhaler use in the home environment is possible with a mobile video application that gives us a better insight into the most common inhaler mistakes performed by patients at home. Inhaler errors start appearing immediately on Day 1 after the training, and incorrect inspiratory flow rates and forgetting to do gargles are common errors. Early detection of inhaler errors at home may be possible through this method.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsNebulizers and VaporizersSmartphoneAdolescentAdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsSelf CareVideo RecordingYoung AdultAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33067469
PMCPMC7567806
OpenAlexW3093184096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.