Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33067413›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2020

Spinal cord stimulation and rehabilitation in an individual with chronic complete L1 paraplegia due to a conus medullaris injury: motor and functional outcomes at 18 months.

Max O Krucoff, Robert Gramer, Dana Lott, Emily Kale, Amol P Yadav, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr, Saurabh R Sinha, Shivanand P Lad

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synergistic implications of combinatorial rehabilitation approaches using spinal stimulation on therapeutic outcomes in spinal cord injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. The 2020 Yearbook of Neurorestoratology.Journal of neurorestoratology · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Max O KrucoffDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA. maxkrucoff@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9577-8944
Robert GramerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Dana LottDepartment of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Emily KaleDepartment of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Amol P YadavDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4913-8006
Muhammad M Abd-El-BarrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Saurabh R SinhaDepartment of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Shivanand P LadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USMarquette University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Epidural Conus Medullaris Stimulation to Alleviate Pain and Augment Rehabilitation in Patients with Subacute Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)UH3NS115647 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Shivanand P Lad · 2020 to 2026
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS115647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEpidural electrical stimulation of the conus medullaris has helped facilitate native motor recovery in individuals with complete cervicothoracic spinal cord injuries (SCI). A theorized mechanism of clinical improvement includes supporting central pattern generators intrinsic to the conus medullaris. Because spinal cord stimulators (SCS) are approved for the treatment of neuropathic pain, we were able to test this experimental therapy in a subject with complete L1 paraplegia and neuropathic genital pain due to a traumatic conus injury. CASE PRESENTATION: An otherwise healthy 48-year-old male with chronic complete L1 paraplegia with no zones of partial preservation (ZPP) and intractable neuropathic genital pain presented to our group seeking nonmedical pain relief and any possible help with functional restoration. After extensive evaluation, discussion, and consent, we proceeded with SCS implantation at the conus and an intensive outpatient physical therapy regimen consistent with the recent SCI rehabilitation literature. DISCUSSION: Intraoperatively, no electromyography (EMG) could be elicited with epidural conus stimulation. At 18 months after implantation, his motor ZPPs had advanced from L1 to L5 on the left and from L1 to L3 on the right. Qualitative increases in lower extremity resting state EMG amplitudes were noted, although there was no consistent evidence of voluntary EMG or rhythmic locomotive leg movements. Three validated functional and quality of life (QoL) surveys demonstrated substantial improvements. The modest motor response compared to the literature suggests likely critical differences in the anatomy of such a low injury. However, the change in ZPPs and QoL suggest potential for neuroplasticity even in this patient population.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationHumansMaleMiddle AgedParaplegiaQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID33067413
PMCPMC7567797
OpenAlexW3092981777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.