ArticleGenetics2020
Detecting Selection from Linked Sites Using an
Article in Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population size rescaling significantly biases outcomes of forward-in-time population genetic simulations.Genetics · 2025Article
- Population Genomic Scans for Natural Selection and Demography.Annual review of genetics · 2024Review
- Population size rescaling significantly biases outcomes of forward-in-time population genetic simulations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Inference of Locus-Specific Population Mixtures from Linked Genome-Wide Allele Frequencies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Disparate genetic divergence patterns in three corals across a pan-Pacific environmental gradient highlight species-specific adaptation.npj biodiversity · 2023Article
- Identifying loci under selection via explicit demographic models.Molecular ecology resources · 2021Article
- Selection on ancestral genetic variation fuels repeated ecotype formation in bottlenose dolphins.Science advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allele frequencies vary across populations and loci, even in the presence of migration. While most differences may be due to genetic drift, divergent selection will further increase differentiation at some loci. Identifying those is key in studying local adaptation, but remains statistically challenging. A particularly elegant way to describe allele frequency differences among populations connected by migration is the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.