Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33067280›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Factors associated with non-initiation of mental healthcare after detection of poor mental health at a scheduled health check: a cohort study.

Christine Geyti, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Else-Marie Dalsgaard, Bodil Hammer Bech, Jane Gunn, Helle Terkildsen Maindal, Annelli Sandbaek

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02028195 (The CORE-trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02028195 naunknown statusnot on this map

The CORE-trial: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care Investigating Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Check Your Health Preventive Programme Offered Population-wide to 30-49 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2013 to 2019Enrolled11,000ConditionsHealth Promotion, Cardiovascular Disease, Physical Inactivity, Selfreported Quality of HealthArmsHealth check
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christine GeytiDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark christine.geyti@ph.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-3046-4901
Kaj Sparle ChristensenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0409-2702
Else-Marie DalsgaardDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2115-7480
Bodil Hammer BechDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0287-3687
Jane GunnDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8836-7525
Helle Terkildsen MaindalDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0525-7254
Annelli SandbaekDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1647-2646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor mental health is an important public health concern, but mental health problems are often under-recognised. Providing feedback to general practitioners (GPs) on their patients' mental health status may improve the identification of cases in need of mental healthcare.

objectivesTo investigate the extent of initiation of mental healthcare after identification of poor mental health and to identify factors associated with non-initiation.

designProspective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.

settingIn a population-based health preventive programme,

participantsParticipants were 350 individuals aged 30-49 years old with screen-detected poor mental health who had not received mental healthcare within the past year. The cohort was derived from 14 167 randomly selected individuals of whom 52% (n=7348) participated. Mental health was assessed by the mental component summary score of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. OUTCOME: The outcome was initiation of mental healthcare. Mental healthcare included psychometric testing by GP, talk therapy by GP, contact with a psychologist, contact with a psychiatrist and psychotropic medication.

resultsWithin 1 year, 22% (95% CI 18 to 27) of individuals with screen-detected poor mental health initiated mental healthcare. Among individuals who initiated mental healthcare within follow-up, one in six had visited their GP once or less in the preceding year. Male sex (OR: 0.49 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.86)) and less impaired mental health (OR: 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.98)) were associated with non-initiation of mental healthcare. We found no overall association between socioeconomic factors and initiating mental healthcare.

conclusionSystematic provision of mental health test results to GPs may improve the identification of cases in need of mental healthcare, but does not translate into initiation of mental healthcare. Further research should focus on methods to improve initiation of mental healthcare, especially among men. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02028195.

Indexed as

General PractitionersMental Health ServicesAdultCohort StudiesHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedProspective Studiesmental healthprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33067280
PMCPMC7569988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.