ArticleComplementary therapies in medicine2020
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Children with a Developmental Disability and Co-occurring Medical Conditions.
Article in Complementary therapies in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated With the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by Autistic Preschoolers.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- Parental Perceptions and Usage of Unlicensed Cannabidiol Products in Children With Anxiety and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023Article
- Gastrointestinal concerns in children with autism spectrum disorder: A qualitative study of family experiences.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022Article
- Traditional Korean Medicine Usage and Perception: a comparative study between the general population and the disabilities.Journal of pharmacopuncture · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate differences in the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage among children with and without developmental disabilities (DD). Secondarily, the association between CAM usage and comorbid chronic medical conditions was explored among children with DD.
designData come from the 2012 Child Complementary and Alternative Medicine Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative sample of children in the United States between the ages of 4 and 17 (n = 10,218).Main outcome measures Multiple logistical regression models provided insight into the relationships between parent-report CAM usage, DD, and chronic medical conditions.
resultsChildren with developmental disabilities were more likely to use CAMs compared to their typically developing peers (21% vs 16%). Children with DDs and comorbid chronic medical conditions used CAMs at even higher rates (23% vs 18%).
conclusionsResults indicated that children with DD, especially those with a co-occurring chronic medical condition, use CAMs more often that typically developing children. Given scarcity of information on safety and effectiveness, clinical providers need to be alert to which children may be more likely to be exposed to CAMs. Communication between parents and providers needs to include discussion of CAM treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.