Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33066790›Full record

ReviewJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2020

Utilitarian redundancy in local medical systems - theoretical and methodological contributions.

Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros, Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior, Fabiane da Silva Queiroz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patrícia Muniz de MedeirosUniversidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias. Br 104, s/n, Rio Largo, Alagoas, 57100-000, Brazil. patricia.medeiros@ceca.ufal.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3835-5232
Washington Soares Ferreira JúniorLaboratório de Investigações Bioculturais no Semiárido, Universidade de Pernambuco, BR 203, km 2, S/N, Vila Eduardo, Petrolina, Pernambuco, 56328-903, Brazil.
Fabiane da Silva QueirozUniversidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias. Br 104, s/n, Rio Largo, Alagoas, 57100-000, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302786/2016-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilitarian redundancy model (URM) is one of the recent contributions to ethnobiology. We argue that URM can be applied to access use-pressure on plant species, the resilience of socioecological systems (e.g., local medical systems), cultural keystone species, and the role of exotic species in social-ecological systems. Based on previous URM studies, we also emphasize the need to differ practical (considering plants and uses that are currently employed) and theoretical (considering both currently employed and potentially employed plants and uses) redundancy. Based on the main applications of the URM, we propose a new index to access redundancy of a therapeutic indication: the Uredit, so that Uredit = NSp + CR, were Uredit is the Utilitarian Redundancy Index for the therapeutic indication; NSp is the total number of species mentioned for the indication, and CR is the species' contribution to redundancy (in terms of knowledge sharing). The maximum value that the Uredit could reach is twice the number of species employed for the therapeutic indication. We believe that this theoretical and methodological improvement in the model can improve comparisons of redundancy in different social-ecological systems. We also highlight some limitations of the URM (and our Uredit), and we believe that conscious reasons behind people's decisions should be incorporated into future studies on the subject.

Indexed as

EcosystemEthnobotanyKnowledgeModels, TheoreticalBiodiversityBrazilHumansIntroduced SpeciesRural PopulationData analysisLocal medical systemsQuantitative EthnobotanySocial-ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID33066790
PMCPMC7565813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.