Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33066768›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Factors affecting the acceptance of blended learning in medical education: application of UTAUT2 model.

Seyyed Mohsen Azizi, Nasrin Roozbahani, Alireza Khatony

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. E-Learning Acceptance among Oncology Healthcare Professionals in Europe.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Blended learning Component in nursing education: A systematic review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seyyed Mohsen AziziMedical Education and Development Center, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3661-2661
Nasrin RoozbahaniDepartment of Health Education and promotion, Faculty of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5837-672X
Alireza KhatonyClinical Research Development Center of Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. Akhatony@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3552-5539

Funding

the National Agency for Strategic Research in Medical Education. Tehran. Iran 970115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlended learning is a new approach to improving the quality of medical education. Acceptance of blended learning plays an important role in its effective implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate and determine the factors that might affect students' intention to use blended learning.

methodsIn this cross-sectional, correlational study, the sample consisted of 225 Iranian medical sciences students. The theoretical framework for designing the conceptual model was the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Venkatesh et al. (2012) proposed UTAUT2 as a framework to explain a person's behavior while using technology. Data were analyzed using SPSS-18 and AMOS-23 software. Structural equation modeling technique was used to test the hypotheses.

resultsThe validity and reliability of the model constructs were acceptable. Performance Expectance (PE), Effort Expectance (EE), Social Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), Hedonic Motivation (HM), Price Value (PV) and Habit (HT) had a significant effect on the students' behavioral intention to use blended learning. Additionally, behavioral intention to use blended learning had a significant effect on the students' actual use of blended learning (β = 0.645, P ≤ 0.01).

conclusionThe study revealed that the proposed framework based on the UTAUT2 had good potential to identify the factors influencing the students' behavioral intention to use blended learning. Universities can use the results of this study to design and implement successful blended learning courses in medical education.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalLearningCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIranReproducibility of ResultsBlended learningMedical educationStudentsUTAUT2

Identifiers

PMID33066768
PMCPMC7565754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.