Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33066556›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Myofascial Trigger Points Associated with Neck Pain Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marcos J Navarro-Santana, Jorge Sanchez-Infante, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Joshua A Cleland, Patricia Martín-Casas, Gustavo Plaza-Manzano

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05624515 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Dry Needling and Ischaemic Compression of the Scapula Angularis Muscle in Patients With Cervicalgia. Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Católica de ÁvilaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsCervical PainArmsdry needling, Ischaemic compression
NCT07309874 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Dry Needling Targeting Rectus Capitus Posterior Major on Individuals With Headaches

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterRan2026 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsHeadache Disorders, Primary, Headache, CervicogenicArmsDry needling
NCT07368517 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Dry Needling in the Treatment of Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorDeraya UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsMechanical Neck Pain, Neck Pain, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Cervical Spine DysfunctionArmsDry Needling with Exercise, Conventional Physiotherapy with Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of Hamstring Stretching on Pain at Masseter Muscle and Mouth Opening: A Systematic Review.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Patient-Perceived Benefits and Adverse Events of Dry Needling.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcos J Navarro-SantanaDepartment of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Sanchez-InfantePerformance and Sport Rehabilitation Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45003 Toledo, Spain.
César Fernández-de-Las-PeñasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
Joshua A ClelandDoctor of Physical Therapy Program, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Patricia Martín-CasasDepartment of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Gustavo Plaza-ManzanoDepartment of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESTufts University · USUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate the effect of dry needling alone as compared to sham needling, no intervention, or other physical interventions applied over trigger points (TrPs) related with neck pain symptoms. Randomized controlled trials including one group receiving dry needling for TrPs associated with neck pain were identified in electronic databases. Outcomes included pain intensity, pain-related disability, pressure pain thresholds, and cervical range of motion. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) score were used to assessed risk of bias (RoB) and methodological quality of the trials. The quality of evidence was assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Between-groups mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated (3) Twenty-eight trials were finally included. Dry needling reduced pain immediately after (MD -1.53, 95% CI -2.29 to -0.76) and at short-term (MD -2.31, 95% CI -3.64 to -0.99) when compared with sham/placebo/waiting list/other form of dry needling and, also, at short-term (MD -0.51, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.06) compared with manual therapy. No differences in comparison with other physical therapy interventions were observed. An effect on pain-related disability at the short-term was found when comparing dry needing with sham/placebo/waiting list/other form of dry needling (SMD -0.87, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.14) but not with manual therapy or other interventions. Dry needling was effective for improving pressure pain thresholds immediately after the intervention (MD 55.48 kPa, 95% CI 27.03 to 83.93). No effect on cervical range of motion of dry needling against either comparative group was found. No between-treatment effect was observed in any outcome at mid-term. Low to moderate evidence suggests that dry needling can be effective for improving pain intensity and pain-related disability in individuals with neck pain symptoms associated with TrPs at the short-term. No significant effects on pressure pain sensitivity or cervical range of motion were observed. Registration number: OSF Registry-https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P2UWD.

Indexed as

cervical spinedry needlingmeta-analysisneck painsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33066556
PMCPMC7602246
OpenAlexW3092947751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.