ArticleMicromachines2020
Microfluidic Viscometer Using a Suspending Micromembrane for Measurement of Biosamples.
Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic Rheology: An Innovative Method for Viscosity Measurement of Gels and Various Pharmaceuticals.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Microfluidic techniques for mechanical measurements of biological samples.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Biomechanical Assessment of Red Blood Cells in Pulsatile Blood Flows.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Fluid Viscosity Measurement by Means of Secondary Flow in a Curved Channel.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Single Microdroplet Breakup-Assisted Viscosity Measurement.Micromachines · 2022Article
- A Review of Microfluidic Devices for Rheological Characterisation.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Low-consumption photoacoustic method to measure liquid viscosity.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The viscosity of biofluids such as blood and saliva can reflect an individual's health conditions, and viscosity measurements are therefore considered in health monitoring and disease diagnosis. However, conventional viscometers can only handle a larger liquid volume beyond the quantity that can be extracted from a person. Though very effective, micro-sensors based on electrokinetic, ultrasonic, or other principles often have strict requirements for the supporting equipment and complicated procedures and signal processing. Sample contamination is always an important issue. In this paper, we report a microfluidic viscometer requiring a small volume of biosamples (<50 µL) and straightforward operation procedures. It is fabricated with low-cost and biocompatible polymeric materials as one-time-use devices, such that contamination is no longer the concern. It contains a suspending micromembrane located along a microchannel. Under a steady driving pressure, the membrane displacement is a function of viscosity of the liquid sample being tested. We derived a simple analytical relation and perform a simulation for converting the membrane displacement to the sample viscosity. We conducted experiments with liquids (water and mineral oil) with defined properties to verify such a relation. We further applied the micro-viscometer to measure bovine blood samples with different hematocrit levels. It can be concluded that the microfluidic viscometer has a high compatibility with a broad range of biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.