ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
The Role of Mobility Digital Ecosystems for Age-Friendly Urban Public Transport: A Narrative Literature Review.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Older adults' active mobility choices and their specific preferences and needs for their living environment: an intersectional approach.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Digital technology use among age-friendly community initiatives in the United States.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
- Digital healthcare services in the context of age-friendly community initiatives in China: a realist evaluation.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- 'Even if they're late or it takes forever … I will get home': Exploring lived experiences of older paratransit users.Journal of transport & health · 2025Article
- Frail older people ageing in place alone and their perception of the built environment in rural and urban sites: a mixed-methods study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Design proposals for the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home: a service design study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Dementia-Friendly Transportation Services: A Scoping Review.The Gerontologist · 2024Article
- Enhancing Community Participation through Age-Friendly Ecosystems: A Rapid Realist Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Climate-neutral and Smart Cities: a critical review through the lens of environmental justice.Frontiers in sociology · 2023Review
- AI ageism: a critical roadmap for studying age discrimination and exclusion in digitalized societies.AI & society · 2023Article
- A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- SDG-11 and smart cities: Contradictions and overlaps between social and environmental justice research agendas.Frontiers in sociology · 2022Review
- Security Mechanisms of a Mobile Health Application for Promoting Physical Activity among Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the context of the intersection of the global megatrends of urbanisation, ageing societies and digitalisation, this paper explores older people's mobility, with a particular interest in public transport, and a strong consideration of digital/ICT elements. With a focus on (smart) mobility, the paper aims to conceptualise transport, one of the main domains of age-friendly cities as a core element of a smart, age-friendly ecosystem. It also aims to propose a justice-informed perspective for the study of age-friendly smart mobility; to contribute towards a framework for the evaluation of age-friendly smart transport as a core element of the global age-friendly cities programme that comprises mobility practices, digital data, digital networks, material/physical geographies and digital devices and access; and to introduce the term "mobility digital ecosystem" to describe this framework. The paper uses the method of a narrative literature review to weave together a selected range of perspectives from communications, transport, and mobility studies in order to introduce the embeddedness of both communication technology use and mobility practices into their material conditions. Combining insights from communications, mobility and transport and social gerontology with a justice perspective on ICT access and mobility, the paper then develops a framework to study age-friendly smart mobility. What we call a "mobility digital ecosystem" framework comprises five elements-mobility practices, digital data, digital networks, material geographies, digital devices and access to services. The paper contributes a justice-informed perspective that points towards a conceptualisation of age-friendly smart mobility as a core element of the age-friendly cities and communities in the WHO's global age-friendly cities programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.