Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33066515›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Intestinal Explant Cultures from Gilthead Seabream (

David Sánchez Peñaranda, Christine Bäuerl, Ana Tomás-Vidal, Miguel Jover-Cerdá, Guillem Estruch, Gaspar Pérez Martínez, Silvia Martínez Llorens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David Sánchez PeñarandaAquaculture and Biodiversity Research Group, Institute of Science and Animal Technology (ICTA), Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Christine BäuerlDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) (Spanish National Research Council), 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5226-9920
Ana Tomás-VidalAquaculture and Biodiversity Research Group, Institute of Science and Animal Technology (ICTA), Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Miguel Jover-CerdáAquaculture and Biodiversity Research Group, Institute of Science and Animal Technology (ICTA), Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Guillem EstruchAquaculture and Biodiversity Research Group, Institute of Science and Animal Technology (ICTA), Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Gaspar Pérez MartínezDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) (Spanish National Research Council), 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3501-1626
Silvia Martínez LlorensAquaculture and Biodiversity Research Group, Institute of Science and Animal Technology (ICTA), Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-3267
Universitat Politècnica de València · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España AGL2015-70487-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction between diet and intestinal health has been widely discussed, although in vivo approaches have reported limitations. The intestine explant culture system developed provides an advantage since it reduces the number of experimental fish and increases the time of incubation compared to similar methods, becoming a valuable tool in the study of the interactions between pathogenic bacteria, rearing conditions, or dietary components and fish gut immune response. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of the total substitution of fish meal by plants on the immune intestinal status of seabream using an ex vivo bacterial challenge. For this aim, two growth stages of fish were assayed (12 g): phase I (90 days), up to 68 g, and phase II (305 days), up to 250 g. Additionally, in phase II, the effects of long term and short term exposure (15 days) to a plant protein (PP) diet were determined. PP diet altered the mucosal immune homeostasis, the younger fish being more sensitive, and the intestine from fish fed short-term plant diets showed a higher immune response than with long-term feeding.

Indexed as

DietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCyclooxygenase 2Fish ProteinsImmunity, InnateInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6Intestinal MucosaPhotobacteriumPlant Proteins, DietarySea BreamTissue Culture TechniquesVibrio alginolyticusCyclooxygenase 2Fish ProteinsInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6Plant Proteins, Dietaryex vivogilthead seabreaminflammationintestine explants cultureplant proteinRT-qPCR

Identifiers

PMID33066515
PMCPMC7588912
OpenAlexW3093298123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.