Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33066463›Full record

ArticleGenes2020

Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (

Bendegúz Mihalik, Krisztián Frank, Putri Kusuma Astuti, Dániel Szemethy, László Szendrei, László Szemethy, Szilvia Kusza, Viktor Stéger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bendegúz MihalikInstitute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Nature Conservation, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Krisztián FrankInstitute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Nature Conservation, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4111-789X
Putri Kusuma AstutiInstitute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Nature Conservation, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Dániel SzemethyNARIC Agricultural Biotechnological Institute, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
László SzendreiDepartment of Nature Conservation Zoology and Game Management, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
László SzemethyFaculty of Regional Development, University of Pécs, 7100 Szekszárd, Hungary.
Szilvia KuszaAnimal Genetics Laboratory, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-5303
Viktor StégerNARIC Agricultural Biotechnological Institute, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
University of Debrecen · HUAgricultural Biotechnology Institute · HUUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Carpathian Basin the wild boar (

Indexed as

Gene FlowGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationMicrosatellite RepeatsAnimalsFemaleGenotypeHungaryMaleSus scrofaCarpathian Basingenetic diversitymicrosatellitesSus scrofawild boar

Identifiers

PMID33066463
PMCPMC7602151
OpenAlexW3093461430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.