Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33066393›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Stage-Specific Value of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Serum Levels on Survival and Recurrence in Pancreatic Cancer: A Single Center Study and Meta-Analysis.

Labrinus van Manen, Jesse V Groen, Hein Putter, Martin Pichler, Alexander L Vahrmeijer, Bert A Bonsing, J Sven D Mieog

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NANOBODYInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Liquid biopsy approach to pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Labrinus van ManenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2287-107X
Jesse V GroenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2438-4665
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martin PichlerDivision of Clinical Oncology, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8701-9462
Alexander L VahrmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Sven D MieogDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLMedical University of Graz · AT

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding UL2015-7665Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 91619059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the stage-specific prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum levels at diagnosis on overall survival (OS) and time to local recurrence or distant metastases in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Consecutive PDAC patients, discussed at multidisciplinary team meetings from 2013 through 2017, were reviewed. Prognostic factors were stage-specific (resection vs. advanced PDAC) evaluated in Cox proportional hazard models. Additionally, a systematic literature search and meta-analysis was performed, as current literature is lacking a complete overview of used cut-off values and the added value of CEA as prognostic marker. In the retrospective cohort, elevated CA19-9 (>305 kU/L) level was independently associated with poor OS (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.72(1.31-2.26)) and early recurrence (HR: 1.74(1.06-2.86)), whereas CEA was not significantly associated. The meta-analysis showed that both elevated CA19-9 and CEA serum levels were predictors for poor OS (pooled HR: 1.29(1.17-1.42) and HR: 1.51(1.33-1.73), respectively). In the resected cohort, elevated CA19-9 level was significantly associated with early recurrence (pooled HR: 2.41(1.77-3.29)), whereas CEA was not. Elevated CA19-9 serum level appear to be an independent prognostic factor for poor OS and early recurrence in PDAC patients, whereas the prognostic value of CEA is disputable.

Indexed as

carbohydrate antigen 19.9carcinoembryonic antigenpancreatic neoplasmsrecurrencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID33066393
PMCPMC7602123
OpenAlexW3092745717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.