ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A Closer Look at Changes in High-Risk Food-Handling Behaviors and Perceptions of Primary Food Handlers at Home in South Korea across Time.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Avoiding the Temperature Danger Zone: A Slovenian Consumer Food Safety Study on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Based on Questionnaire Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Slovenian Consumer Food Safety Study: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices from Shopping to Preparation Based on Questionnaire Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing risk factors for foodborne illness in restaurants in Seoul.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Current Trends in Food Health and Safety in Cross-Cultural Sensory and Consumer Science.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food-handling behaviors and risk perceptions among primary food handlers were investigated by consumer surveys from different subjects in 2010 (N = 609; 1st survey will be called here "Year 2010") and 2019 (N = 605; 2nd survey will be called here "Year 2019"). Year 2010 was characterized by consumers' risk perception-behavior gap (i.e., consumers knew safe methods for food-handling, but responses regarding the behaviors did not support their confidence in food safety): they 1) did not wash/trim foods before storage, 2) thawed frozen foods at room temperature, and 3) exposed leftovers to danger zone temperatures. These trends were not improved and the gaps in Year 2010 remained in Year 2019. Year 2010 was also characterized by other common high-risk behaviors improved during 8 years for the following aspects: 1) 70.0% of consumers divided a large portion of food into smaller pieces for storage, but few consumers (12.5%) labeled divided foods with relevant information, and 2) they excessively reused kitchen utensils. Whereas in Year 2019, more consumers (25.7%) labeled food and usage periods for kitchen utensils were shortened. Consumers usually conformed to food safety rules in both Year 2010 and 2019: 1) separate storage of foods, 2) storage of foods in the proper places/periods, 3) washing fruits/vegetables before eating, 4) washing hands after handling potentially hazardous foods, and 5) cooking foods and reheating leftovers to eat. Our findings provided resources for understanding consumers' high-risk behaviors/perceptions at home, highlighting the importance of behavioral control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.