Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33066272›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Animal Research beyond the Laboratory: Report from a Workshop on Places Other than Licensed Establishments (POLEs) in the UK.

Alexandra Palmer, Beth Greenhough, Pru Hobson-West, Reuben Message, James N Aegerter, Zoe Belshaw, Ngaire Dennison, Roger Dickey, Julie Lane, Jamie Lorimer and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Animal research, ethical boundary-work, and the geographies of veterinary expertise.Transactions (Institute of British Geographers : 1965) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Out of the laboratory, into the field: perspectives on social, ethical and regulatory challenges in UK wildlife research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alexandra PalmerSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Beth GreenhoughSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7351-2619
Pru Hobson-WestSchool of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Reuben MessageSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-3282
James N AegerterNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK.
Zoe BelshawPDSA Nottingham, Dunkirk Road, Nottingham NG7 2PH, UK.
Ngaire DennisonBiological Services, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Roger DickeyArmy Ornithological Society (AOS), Aldershot GU11 1PS, UK.
Julie LaneNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK.
Jamie LorimerSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Kate MillarCentre for Applied Bioethics, School of Biosciences and School of Veterinary Medicine and Science (SVMS), University of Nottingham, Nottingham LE12 5PF, UK.
Chris NewmanWildlife Conservation Research Unit, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13 5QL, UK.
Kirsten PullenWild Planet Trust, Paignton Zoo, Totnes Road, Paignton TQ4 7EU, UK.
S James ReynoldsArmy Ornithological Society (AOS), Aldershot GU11 1PS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-1324
Dominic J WellsDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London NW1 0TU, UK.
Matthew J WittCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9498-5378
Sarah WolfensohnSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-3603

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205393/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT205393/A/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research involving animals that occurs outside the laboratory raises an array of unique challenges. With regard to UK legislation, however, it receives only limited attention in terms of official guidelines, support, and statistics, which are unsurprisingly orientated towards the laboratory environment in which the majority of animal research takes place. In September 2019, four social scientists from the Animal Research Nexus program gathered together a group of 13 experts to discuss nonlaboratory research under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (A(SP)A) of 1986 (mirroring European Union (EU) Directive 2010/63/EU), which is the primary mechanism for regulating animal research in the UK. Such nonlaboratory research under the A(SP)A often occurs at Places Other than Licensed Establishments (POLEs). The primary objective of the workshop was to assemble a diverse group with experience across a variety of POLEs (e.g., wildlife field sites, farms, fisheries, veterinary clinics, zoos) to explore the practical, ethical, and regulatory challenges of conducting research at POLEs. While consensus was not sought, nor reached on every point of discussion, we collectively identified five key areas that we propose require further discussion and attention. These relate to: (1) support and training; (2) ethical review; (3) cultures of care, particularly in nonregulated research outside of the laboratory; (4) the setting of boundaries; and (5) statistics and transparency. The workshop generated robust discussion and thereby highlighted the value of focusing on the unique challenges posed by POLEs, and the need for further opportunities for exchanging experiences and sharing best practice relating to research projects outside of the laboratory in the UK and elsewhere.

Indexed as

animal researchanimal welfarefarmsfisheriesgovernancepolicyveterinary medicinewildlifezoos

Identifiers

PMID33066272
PMCPMC7602001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.