Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33066127›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Comprehensive Survey on Nanobiomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.

Pawan Kumar, Meenu Saini, Brijnandan S Dehiya, Anil Sindhu, Vinod Kumar, Ravinder Kumar, Luciano Lamberti, Catalin I Pruncu, Rajesh Thakur

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Hope for bone regeneration: The versatility of iron oxide nanoparticles.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Advances in Growth Factor Delivery for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Pawan KumarDepartment of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal 131039, Haryana, India.
Meenu SainiDepartment of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal 131039, Haryana, India.
Brijnandan S DehiyaDepartment of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal 131039, Haryana, India.
Anil SindhuDepartment of Biotechnology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal 131039, Haryana, India.
Vinod KumarDepartment of Bio and Nanotechnology, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, Haryana, India.
Ravinder KumarSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India.
Luciano LambertiDipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.
Catalin I PruncuDepartment of Design, Manufacturing & Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK.
Rajesh ThakurDepartment of Bio and Nanotechnology, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, Haryana, India.
Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology · INGuru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology · INLovely Professional University · INPolytechnic University of Bari · ITUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most important ideas ever produced by the application of materials science to the medical field is the notion of biomaterials. The nanostructured biomaterials play a crucial role in the development of new treatment strategies including not only the replacement of tissues and organs, but also repair and regeneration. They are designed to interact with damaged or injured tissues to induce regeneration, or as a forest for the production of laboratory tissues, so they must be micro-environmentally sensitive. The existing materials have many limitations, including impaired cell attachment, proliferation, and toxicity. Nanotechnology may open new avenues to bone tissue engineering by forming new assemblies similar in size and shape to the existing hierarchical bone structure. Organic and inorganic nanobiomaterials are increasingly used for bone tissue engineering applications because they may allow to overcome some of the current restrictions entailed by bone regeneration methods. This review covers the applications of different organic and inorganic nanobiomaterials in the field of hard tissue engineering.

Indexed as

hard tissue engineeringnano-biomaterialsnanotechnologyscaffolds

Identifiers

PMID33066127
PMCPMC7601994
OpenAlexW3093352269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.