ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2020
Primary Care Physician Experiences with Integrated Population-Scale Genetic Testing: A Mixed-Methods Assessment.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Building capacity for genomics in primary care: a scoping review of practitioner attitudes, education needs, and enablers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- An electronic review of clinical outcomes after return of actionable genetic research results from a health system research biobank.European journal of medical genetics · 2025Trial
- Primary care physician use of patient race and polygenic risk scores in medical decision-making.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Trial
- Non-genetic physicians' self-assessment of knowledge and confidence toward genetic testing and counseling: a national survey in a high consanguineous population.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Integrating genomic medicine into primary care: a precision health model from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical translation of polygenic scores for prostate cancer screening.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Primary care patient and clinician attitudes about population genomic screening, informed decision-making needs, and the potential for Chatbot technology.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Geno4ME Study: implementation of whole genome sequencing for population screening in a large healthcare system.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Using mixed methods for genetic counseling research.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Revolutionising Cardio-Oncology Care with Precision Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Primary Care Providers' Experiences With an Active Elective Genetic Testing Program.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025Article
- Exploring Genetic Testing for Rare Disorders of Obesity: Experience and Perspectives of Pediatric Weight Management Providers.Childhood obesity (Print) · 2024Article
- Survey of service needs to embed genome sequencing for motor neuron disease in neurology in the English National Health Service.Journal of medical genetics · 2024Article
- Genetics Visit Uptake Among Individuals Receiving Clinically Actionable Genomic Screening Results.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Data from a national survey of United States primary care physicians on genetic risk scores for common disease prevention.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Processes and outcomes from a clinical genetics e-consultation service managed by a primary care physician champion.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Perceived benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: Results of a national physician survey.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- The effect of genetic education on the referral of patients to genetic evaluation: Findings from a national survey of nephrologists.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Personalized medicine in a community health system: the NorthShore experience.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The scalable delivery of genomic medicine requires collaboration between genetics and non-genetics providers. Thus, it is essential to investigate and address the perceived value of and barriers to incorporating genetic testing into the clinical practice of primary care providers (PCPs). We used a mixed-methods approach of qualitative interviews and surveys to explore the experience of PCPs involved in the pilot DNA-10K population genetic testing program. Similar to previous research, PCPs reported low confidence with tasks related to ordering, interpreting and managing the results of genetic tests, and identified the need for additional education. PCPs endorsed high levels of utility for patients and their families but noted logistical challenges to incorporating genetic testing into their practice. Overall PCPs were not familiar with the United States' Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and they expressed high levels of concern for patient data privacy and potential insurance discrimination. This PCP feedback led to the development and implementation of several processes to improve the PCP experience with the DNA-10K program. These results contribute to the knowledge base regarding genomic implementation using a mixed provider model and may be beneficial for institutions developing similar clinical programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.