ReviewJournal of affective disorders2020
Impact of respiratory protective devices on respiration: Implications for panic vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Review in Journal of affective disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05708222 (Investigation of the Likelihood of a Current Major Depressive Episode in Individuals Referred to Sleep Clinics for Polysomnography), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation of the Likelihood of a Current Major Depressive Episode in Individuals Referred to Sleep Clinics for Polysomnography (PSG) Assessment Using the MEB-001 Device.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of different personal protective equipment on the cardiovascular system in a 6-minute walk test.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Cutting-Edge Approaches in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Smart facemask for wireless CONature communications · 2022Article
- Inhaled COEnvironmental health insights · 2022Article
- The effects of face mask specifications on work of breathing and particle filtration efficiency.Medical engineering & physics · 2021Article
- Personal Protective Equipment Alters Leg Muscle Fatigability Independent of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Comparison with Pre-COVID-19 Pandemic Results.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Ultrafine PVDF Nanofibers for Filtration of Air-Borne Particulate Matters: A Comprehensive Review.Polymers · 2021Review
- Disaster management of the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of emergency medicine · 2021Review
- Challenges and Controversies in COVID-19: Masking the General Population may Attenuate This Pandemic's Outbreak.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Uncertainty, alexithymia, suppression and vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.Health psychology report · 2021Article
- Side-Effects of Public Health Policies Against Covid-19: The Story of an Over-Reaction.Frontiers in public healthArticle
- Admissions to Medical School during the COVID-19 Era without the MCAT.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe wearing of respiratory protective devices (RPDs) correctly and continually in situations where people are at risk of respiratory infections is crucial for infection prevention. Certain people are poorly compliant with RPDs due to RPD-related annoyance, including respiratory discomfort. We hypothesized that individuals vulnerable to panic attacks are included in this group. No published studies on this topic are available. The evidence for our hypothesis was reviewed in this study as a starting point for future research.
methodsWe selected a set of experimental studies that measured the respiratory physiological burden in RPD wearers through objective and validated methods. We conducted a bibliographic search of publications in the PubMed database (January 2000-May 2020) to identify representative studies that may be of interest for panic respiratory pathophysiology.
resultsFive studies were included. Wearing RPDs exerted significant respiratory effects, including increased breathing resistance, CO LIMITATIONS: Most studies had a small sample size, with a preponderance of young participants. Different methodologies were used across the studies. Furthermore, differences in physical responses between wearing RPDs in experimental settings or daily life cannot be excluded.
conclusionsThis research supports the idea that panic-prone individuals may be at higher risk of respiratory discomfort when wearing RPDs, thereby reducing their tolerance for these devices. Strategies to decrease discomfort should be identified to overcome the risk of poor compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.