ReviewPsychiatry research2020
"Guarding the Gatekeepers": Suicides among Mental Health Professionals and Scope of Prevention, A Review.
Review in Psychiatry research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the spatial distribution of occupational burnout among mental health professionals at the city, county, and township levels in Guangxi and related influencing factors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Mapping intervention strategies and mental health support journeys in addressing mental health challenges among healthcare professionals - a scoping review.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Mental health self-medication in psychiatry residents: from providing to seeking mental health care.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- How do young adults deal with suicidal ideation? A qualitative study of the experiences of stakeholders.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide is a social evil that is considered to be a global epidemic. Mental healthcare professionals (MHP) (psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychiatric social work, etc.) are often involved as 'gatekeepers' in the management of suicidality and suicide prevention. Even though the risk of suicide in medical profession has received attention in research, there has been scarcity of literature related to the same in MHPs. They are not immune to the perils of psychological distress and its cascading consequences including suicide, contrary to the popular societal myths. The intrinsic and extrinsic pressures of the profession, persistent discourse in managing the psychological distress of others, professional burnout, self-stigma, societal apathy and easy access to psychotropics are certain factors making the MHPs more vulnerable. This disengagement and stress can contribute to depression, anxiety and complex trauma in the MHPs. The situation is furthermore compounded in developing countries with resource constraints, low MHP: patient ratio and inflexibility of work schedules. This makes tailored interventions, peer counselling, periodic mental health screenings and administrative understanding and accountability necessary at all levels. Keeping this in background, the review glances at the risk factors of suicide related to MHPs, highlights the problem statement and discusses the possible interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.