Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33065275›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology2020

Vitamin D and survival in COVID-19 patients: A quasi-experimental study.

Cédric Annweiler, Bérangère Hanotte, Claire Grandin de l'Eprevier, Jean-Marc Sabatier, Ludovic Lafaie, Thomas Célarier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
30.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Guideline
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cédric AnnweilerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Center on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France; UPRES EA 4638, University of Angers, Angers, France; Robarts Research Institute, Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Cedric.Annweiler@chu-angers.fr.
Bérangère HanotteDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Claire Grandin de l'EprevierGeriatric Hospital of Saint Laurent de Chamousset, Saint Laurent de Chamousset, France.
Jean-Marc SabatierUniversité Aix-Marseille, Institut de Neuro-Physiopathologie (INP), UMR 7051, Faculté de Pharmacie, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France.
Ludovic LafaieDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Thomas CélarierDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; Chaire Santé des Ainés, University of Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France; Gérontopôle Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Saint-Etienne, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRCancéropôle Lyon Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes · FRInstitut de Neurophysiopathologie · FRWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D may be a central biological determinant of COVID-19 outcomes. The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to determine whether bolus vitamin D3 supplementation taken during or just before COVID-19 was effective in improving survival among frail elderly nursing-home residents with COVID-19. Sixty-six residents with COVID-19 from a French nursing-home were included in this quasi-experimental study. The "Intervention group" was defined as those having received bolus vitamin D3 supplementation during COVID-19 or in the preceding month, and the "Comparator group" corresponded to all other participants. The primary and secondary outcomes were COVID-19 mortality and Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (OSCI) score in acute phase, respectively. Age, gender, number of drugs daily taken, functional abilities, albuminemia, use of corticosteroids and/or hydroxychloroquine and/or antibiotics (i.e., azithromycin or rovamycin), and hospitalization for COVID-19 were used as potential confounders. The Intervention (n = 57; mean ± SD, 87.7 ± 9.3years; 79 %women) and Comparator (n = 9; mean, 87.4 ± 7.2years; 67 %women) groups were comparable at baseline, as were the COVID-19 severity and the use of dedicated COVID-19 drugs. The mean follow-up time was 36 ± 17 days. 82.5 % of participants in the Intervention group survived COVID-19, compared to only 44.4 % in the Comparator group (P = 0.023). The full-adjusted hazard ratio for mortality according to vitamin D3 supplementation was HR = 0.11 [95 %CI:0.03;0.48], P = 0.003. Kaplan-Meier distributions showed that Intervention group had longer survival time than Comparator group (log-rank P = 0.002). Finally, vitamin D3 supplementation was inversely associated with OSCI score for COVID-19 (β=-3.84 [95 %CI:-6.07;-1.62], P = 0.001). In conclusion, bolus vitamin D3 supplementation during or just before COVID-19 was associated in frail elderly with less severe COVID-19 and better survival rate.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBetacoronavirusCholecalciferolCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexCholecalciferolVitamin DCOVID-19Older adultsQuasi-experimental studySARS-CoV-2TherapeuticsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID33065275
PMCPMC7553119
OpenAlexW3092944659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.