ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020
Apo-Opsin and Its Dark Constitutive Activity across Retinal Cone Subtypes.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of zebrafish rod and cone photoresponses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Visual pigments underlie the sensitivity difference between day and night vision.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Dark continuous noise from visual pigment as a major mechanism underlying rod-cone difference in light sensitivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Loss of functionaliScience · 2024Article
- Low signaling efficiency from receptor to effector in olfactory transduction: A quantified ligand-triggered GPCR pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Visual Gene Expression Reveals a cone-to-rod Developmental Progression in Deep-Sea Fishes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal rod and cone photoreceptors mediate vision in dim and bright light, respectively, by transducing absorbed photons into neural electrical signals. Their phototransduction mechanisms are essentially identical. However, one difference is that, whereas a rod visual pigment remains stable in darkness, a cone pigment has some tendency to dissociate spontaneously into apo-opsin and retinal (the chromophore) without isomerization. This cone-pigment property is long known but has mostly been overlooked. Importantly, because apo-opsin has weak constitutive activity, it triggers transduction to produce electrical noise even in darkness. Currently, the precise dark apo-opsin contents across cone subtypes are mostly unknown, as are their dark activities. We report here a study of goldfish red (L), green (M), and blue (S) cones, finding with microspectrophotometry widely different apo-opsin percentages in darkness, being ∼30% in L cones, ∼3% in M cones, and negligible in S cones. L and M cones also had higher dark apo-opsin noise than holo-pigment thermal isomerization activity. As such, given the most likely low signal amplification at the pigment-to-transducin/phosphodiesterase phototransduction step, especially in L cones, apo-opsin noise may not be easily distinguishable from light responses and thus may affect cone vision near threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.